Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
then “endorsed or mutated in group discussion”. Sir David Manning had suggested
some changes to the draft paper, but “they were not major”.
341.  Mr Dodd remembered:
“… spending some time debating as a group the final wording of the statement
‘the use of overriding force in a ground campaign is the only option that we can be
confident will remove Saddam and bring Iraq back into the international community’.”
Lord Goldsmith’s request to be kept informed
342.  Lord Goldsmith, the Attorney General, asked in early March to be involved in
Ministerial thinking about Iraq as policy was being formulated not just to be asked
for his advice at the last minute.
343.  On 8 March, Mr Paul Berman, a member of the Attorney General’s Office,
contacted the Cabinet Office to say that Lord Goldsmith had seen the previous week’s
Cabinet Conclusions and would hope to be involved in Ministerial thinking about Iraq as
policy was being formulated rather than be consulted formally only at the last minute.125
344.  Mr McKane, explained to Mr Berman that Mr Blair had made clear to Cabinet that
decisions on military action were not imminent; and that it was “well understood” that
the Attorney General would need to be “properly engaged at the right time” but that was
“most unlikely to be before the Prime Minister’s meeting with President Bush”.126
345.  Mr McKane advised Sir David Manning that he thought there was:
“… a good case for engaging the Attorney General in a discussion, so that he
understands the options and the policy background, before he is asked formally
for advice. Intriguingly Paul Berman said that the Attorney General did not rule out
justification for military action based on Article 51 (self defence) but would certainly
want to be assured that the alternatives (UN Security Council resolutions) had been
thoroughly explored in the first instance.”
346.  Sir David Manning replied to Mr McKane: “I think we should engage the Attorney
after the Texan [Crawford] summit.”127
347.  In a minute to Lord Goldsmith, Mr Berman recorded that he had told Mr McKane
that Lord Goldsmith:
“… wanted to be in a position to engage constructively with this issue. This meant
keeping you in the loop from a very early stage, as policy was being formulated,
125  Minute McKane to Manning, 8 March 2002, ‘Iraq’.
126  Minute McKane to Manning, 8 March 2002, ‘Iraq’.
127  Manuscript comment Manning to McKane, 8 March 2002, on Minute McKane to Manning,
8 March 2002, ‘Iraq’.
447
Previous page | Contents | Next page