Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
155.  In the first of its Key Judgements, the JIC stated:
“Saddam fears a US military attack which would threaten his regime by bringing
about the disintegration of his military and security apparatus. A force on the scale
of Desert Storm (1991) would constitute such a threat.”53
156.  The JIC also judged that Saddam did not believe such an attack was inevitable.
157.  In addition, the JIC’s Key Judgements were:
Saddam Hussein continued to “resist the enforcement” of Security Council
resolutions “on disarmament while encouraging sanctions erosion”. His strategy
was “threatened by US/UK efforts to introduce the Goods Review List (GRL) and
make Iraq accept weapons inspectors”. Iraq saw the GRL as “making sanctions
indefinitely sustainable”. But “the greatest risk seen by Saddam” was “that
non‑compliance with the UN may be used to justify a full-scale US attack”.
Saddam had: “In response … begun a nominal re-engagement with the UN
and a diplomatic charm offensive.” So far he had offered “nothing new”. The
JIC judged that if the threat of large-scale military action was believed to be
imminent, Saddam would permit the return of weapons inspectors. It they did
return Saddam would “frustrate their efforts” and he would “continue to play for
time”.
Iraq continued “to pursue its WMD programmes. Design work for missiles with
ranges greater than the UN limit of 150km is under way. If it has not already
done so, Iraq could produce significant quantities of biological warfare agent
within days and chemical warfare agents within weeks of a decision to do so.”
The Special Republican Guard (SRG) remained “closely tied to Saddam’s
regime” and was “likely to resist any attempt to overthrow him”. The Republican
Guard was also “favoured” and was “relatively well equipped and trained; it
would be relatively resilient under attack, but its loyalty in dire straits is more
open to question than the SRG”. “Other elements of the Iraqi military” were
“more liable to crack if subjected to strong attack”.
Kurdish and Shia groups formed “the most significant opposition to Baghdad”.
The “opposition” was “militarily weak and riven by factional differences”. They
would “not act without visible and sustained US military support on the ground”.
A “coup or military revolt” was “only a remote possibility”.
158.  The JIC stated that the US reaction, to the attacks on 11 September, had “been a
jolt” to Saddam Hussein’s position. President Bush’s speech labelling Iraq as part of an
“axis of evil” would have “reinforced” Saddam Hussein’s concern.
53  JIC Assessment, 27 February 2002, ‘Iraq: Saddam Under the Spotlight’.
413
Previous page | Contents | Next page