Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, January to April 2002 – “axis of evil” to Crawford
138.  Sir David Manning sent the letter to Mr Blair, commenting:
“Interesting account of the latest US thinking. Much as expected: […]”46
139.  Mr Blair replied:
“I still don’t see how the military option will work, but I guess there will be an
answer.”47
140.  Sir Richard Dearlove’s letter was also shown to Mr Straw and Sir Richard Wilson.
141.  Sir Richard Dearlove briefed Mr Gordon Brown, Chancellor of the Exchequer, on
4 March. The discussion included the possibility of the US taking “serious military action”
in the autumn.48
142.  In his memoir, published in 2007, Mr George Tenet, the Director of Central
Intelligence, described how the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had concluded that
American “boots on the ground” would be needed to remove Saddam Hussein.49
143.  Mr Tenet recorded that a new Head of the Iraq Operations Group inside the CIA
Directorate of Operations had been appointed in August 2001 who had:
“… conducted a review of the lessons learned from our long and not-too-happy
history of running operations against Iraq since …1991. The principal message …
from the review was that Saddam was not going to be removed via covert action
alone. As much as some would wish for … some quick, easy, and cheap solution to
regime change in Iraq – it was not going to happen.”
144.  Mr Tenet added that the CIA’s “analysis concluded that Saddam was too deeply
entrenched and had too many layers of security around him for there to be an easy way
to remove him”; and the Iraqi reaction was “always” that: “If you are serious about this,
we want to see American boots on the ground.”
145.  Mr Tenet wrote that his own “aversion to a CIA go-it-alone strategy was based on
our estimate of the chance of success (slim to none)” and his belief that the CIA “plate
was already overflowing with missions in the war on terrorism”.
146.  Mr Tenet observed that even if such action “managed to take Saddam out, the
beneficiary was likely to have been another Sunni general no better that the man he
replaced”. That “would not have been consistent with the Administration’s intent that
a new Iraq might serve as a beacon of democracy in the Middle East”.
46  Manuscript comment Manning to Prime Minister, 27 February 2002, on Letter C to Manning,
26 February 2002, ‘US Policy on Iraq’.
47  Manuscript comment Blair to Manning on Letter C to Manning, 26 February 2002, ‘US Policy on Iraq’.
48  SIS record, 6 March 2003.
49  Tenet G & Harlow B. At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the CIA. HarperPress, 2007.
411
Previous page | Contents | Next page