Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
44.  Sir David Manning had asked Mr John Scarlett, Chairman of the Joint Intelligence
Committee (JIC), for “an analysis of the state of opinion in Iraq” and whether there were
“really segments of the population who might be willing to rise against Saddam … David
was sceptical. He also mentioned work … on the … INC [Iraqi National Congress].”15
45.  Mr Wright informed the meeting of the JIC on 13 February that US policy towards
Iraq was “going to be the dominant one for relationships with US and Europe over the
next few weeks”.16 The Embassy in Washington had produced a “paper drawing together
all available information” which was circulated to JIC members.
46.  In the discussion the following points were made:
Policy discussions between US Principals were expected in the next 10-14 days
but there was no evidence that anything sudden or unexpected would happen.
US air supremacy “could be quick to secure, but the assembly of a large enough
force to bind measures together would take much longer”.
“In the meantime Saddam had a number of options open to him to queer the
US pitch.”
47.  JIC members were invited to “share quickly” any useful analysis or information they
received.
48.  The date and context of the JIC discussion suggests that Mr Wright was referring
to Sir Christopher Meyer’s telegram of 13 February, received in London that morning.17
49.  Sir David Manning told the Inquiry that:
“… Dr Rice had confirmed … that the Administration was indeed looking at options,
but said that there was absolutely no plan at this stage. It was an effort to redefine
policy.”18
50.  Mr Jonathan Powell, Mr Blair’s Chief of Staff, told the Inquiry that “it was February
and March that they [the US] started to get into more concrete plans … for considering
how they would actually deal with Iraq”.19 Sir David Manning had spoken to Dr Rice on
14 February to make sure:
“… the Americans would not plunge into any plans before the Prime Minister met the
President at Crawford and received an assurance that they wouldn’t.”
51.  The record of the discussion confirms that Sir David Manning told Dr Rice that US
policy on Iraq “continued to be a source of intense speculation in the British media, as
15  Minute Ehrman to Goulty, 13 February 2002, ‘US/Iraq’.
16  Minutes, 13 February 2002, JIC meeting.
17  Telegram 197 Washington to FCO London, 13 February 2002, ‘US/IRAQ: The Momentum Builds’.
18  Public hearing, 30 November 2009, pages 10-11.
19  Public hearing, 18 January 2010, pages 17-18.
396
Previous page | Contents | Next page