Previous page | Contents | Next page
3.1  |  Development of UK strategy and options, 9/11 to early January 2002
it with the Americans. They were likely to bring it to us. I think there’s a distinction
there.”156
322.  Mr Straw confirmed that he had seen the second and third papers sent to No.10.157
Mr Straw wrote that his comments were based on the two papers taken together and
that from his perspective SIS4’s reference to the need for assurances of legality were:
“… spelling out quite plainly that ‘assurances of legality’ were an essential
pre‑condition to any HMG policy in support of UK military action with the objective
of regime change.”
323.  Mr Straw emphasised that one of the central arguments against regime change
was, as the FCO advice of 3 December and SIS4’s paper had made clear, “the fact
that it was illegal”.
Mr Blair’s paper for President Bush, 4 December 2001
324.  Mr Blair and President Bush discussed future options for Iraq on
3 December 2001.
325.  Mr Blair told President Bush that he was not opposed to the removal of
Saddam Hussein, but an extremely clever plan would be needed.
326.  Mr Blair suggested the visit to Washington by Sir David Manning and
Sir Richard Dearlove later that week would be an opportunity to share thinking
on the next phase.
327.  Mr Blair spoke to President Bush by telephone on 3 December.158
328.  The conversation was primarily about the position in Afghanistan, including the
prospects for the Bonn Conference to generate a request for an international security
force, possibly under UN auspices, and whether the UK might lead such a force.
329.  In a discussion on future options in relation to Iraq, Mr Blair told President Bush
that Sir David Manning and Sir Richard Dearlove would be in Washington later
that week. That would be an opportunity to share thinking on “how the next phase
might proceed”.
330.  In response to a discussion about the potential effects in the Middle East if
Saddam Hussein were overthrown, Mr Blair said that:
“… contrary to press reporting, he was not in a different place on this … it would
be excellent to get rid of Saddam. But there needed to be a clever strategy for
doing this.”
156  Private hearing, Part 1, page 15.
157  Statement, 16 March 2011, page 1.
158  Letter Tatham to McDonald, 3 December 2001, ‘Telephone Conversation with President Bush’.
367
Previous page | Contents | Next page