Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.1  |  Reconstruction: March 2003 to June 2004
164.  ORHA and the Coalition might enjoy a “brief honeymoon”, but not if the Coalition
seemed set on administering Iraq for more than a brief period. It was therefore
necessary to put in place interim arrangements for post-conflict administration that would
be accepted by the Iraqi people and the Arab and Islamic world.
165.  A resolution would be required to authorise those interim arrangements, and to
provide a legal basis for “reconstruction and reform”:
“Without a UNSCR, other countries, international organisations, the IFIs, UN
agencies and NGOs will be comparatively limited in what they can do … That would
leave US/UK with no viable exit strategy from Iraq and a huge bill.”
166.  The IPU negotiating brief stated that the task for Camp David was to build on five
areas where there was already agreement between the UK and US:
The Coalition, through ORHA, would be responsible for the administration of Iraq
for the first few weeks.
The UN should not be asked to run Iraq.
The objective should be Security Council authorisation or endorsement for an
international presence that would include the UN.
Coalition, not UN troops would provide security on the ground.
As soon as possible, Iraq should govern itself.
167.  The IPU stated that differences between the UK and US positions remained
significant. The IPU explained that the US approach amounted to:
“… asking the UNSC to endorse Coalition military control over Iraq’s transitional
administration, its representative institutions and its revenues until such time as a
fully-fledged Iraqi government is ready to take over. It would marginalise the role of
a UN Special Co-ordinator. These ideas are a non-starter for the Security Council,
would be denounced by the Iraqis and the wider Arab/Islamic world, and would not
provide the stability needed to develop the new Iraq.”
168.  The IPU stated that there was “still some distance to go if we are to agree a way
forward to avoid an inchoate start to Phase IV”.
169.  The IPU set out a number of “propositions” which it hoped Mr Blair and President
Bush could agree. Those propositions and the progress of the negotiations on resolution
1483 are addressed in Section 9.1.
31
Previous page | Contents | Next page