Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.1  |  Reconstruction: March 2003 to June 2004
on that point at Mr Blair’s meeting that morning. Ms Short asked her Private Office to
request that the Attorney General’s advice be committed to paper.
117.  Ms Short reported that “the Prime Minister had given her responsibility for
reconstruction in Iraq”. That role should be underpinned by a Cabinet Office Committee
chaired by Mr Chakrabarti. Ms Short added: “This area was our lead in Whitehall and
we needed to ensure that this was recognised.” Mr Chakrabarti said that he had already
spoken to Sir Andrew Turnbull, the Cabinet Secretary.
118.  Cabinet discussed Iraq on 27 March.84 Looking ahead, the Iraqi economy had
potential and the bureaucracy was competent. Iraq was not a failed state and should not
be a burden on the international community. Mr Hoon said that securing Iraq’s essential
economic infrastructure had been achieved through seizing the southern oilfields almost
intact. The sooner the oil could flow again, the sooner the profits could be used for the
Iraqi people.
119.  DFID produced its first substantive paper on post-conflict reconstruction at the end
of March.
120.  On 27 March, Mr Alistair Fernie, Head of DFID’s Middle East and North Africa
Department, sent a paper on reconstruction planning to Ms Short.85 Ms Short had seen
an earlier draft on 20 March.
121.  Mr Fernie advised that officials were:
“… now thinking how to take this [the paper] forward as part of a more
comprehensive DFID-led process across Whitehall, looking at the whole range of
international activities needed to help Iraq recover from conflict, sanctions and years
of misrule.”
122.  Mr Fernie advised that the paper had been revised to take account of Ms Short’s
comments on “getting the multilateral system working to support Iraqi institutions, the
importance of sustainable debt and reparations strategy, and focusing on using and
developing Iraqi talent rather than bringing in too many international consultants”.
123.  Comments had been received from the FCO, Treasury and Cabinet Office,
centring on:
what the UK would do if there were no resolution authorising reconstruction;
Mr Fernie advised that, with the Attorney General’s advice now in writing,
“we should stick to our position that without an SCR the UK can only support
humanitarian relief and basic civil administration reform to ensure public
security”; and
84  Cabinet Conclusions, 27 March 2003.
85  Minute Fernie to Private Secretary/Secretary of State [DFID], 27 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Iraq Reconstruction
Planning’ attaching Paper DFID, 27 March 2003, ‘Iraq – Reconstruction Planning: Objectives and
Approach’.
23
Previous page | Contents | Next page