Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.2  |  Support for injured Service Personnel and veterans
37.  Gen O’Donoghue told the Inquiry that by 19 March, when military operations against
Iraq began, there remained some “shortfalls” in medical modules:
“We had worked out what equipment we needed. We were allowed to discuss that
informally with industry in, I think, mid-November. We weren’t allowed to place the
orders until early to mid-December, which we did with £34m/£35m worth of UORS,
and those came in between then and March.
“Some items may not have arrived by March, but they came fairly shortly afterwards
and we topped up the modules.”17
38.  Sections 6.3 and 13 describe the development and approval of UOR business cases
within the MOD and discussions with the Treasury on funding UORs. A mechanism
for funding UORs was agreed between Mr Hoon and Mr Brown on 23 September; the
mechanism did not require individual UORs to be agreed by the Treasury. Mr Hoon
agreed that the MOD could begin discussions with industry on the provision of UORs
on 2 December.
39.  Brigadier Alan Hawley, Commander Medical of the Joint Force Logistic Command
during Op TELIC 1 (which covered the initial combat phase of military operations in
Iraq), told the House of Commons Defence Committee in October 2003:
“From where I was, no one informed me of any clinical care that was compromised
by a lack of equipment. I have to say that it was very tight.”18
40.  Brig Hawley assessed that a number of factors had combined to produce that
“rather tight, fraught situation”, including the late release of money for UORs, a new
process for building medical equipment modules, and a change in responsibility for
medical supply from the medical to the logistical Command.
41.  Vice Admiral Ian Jenkins, Surgeon-General from 2002 to 2006, agreed with
Brig Hawley’s assessment:
“… I can categorically assure you that clinical outcomes [during Op TELIC 1] were
uncompromised. Yes there were problems with supply, equipment and everything
else, mobilisation of Reserves, support … but the clinical outcomes were first
class. I can put my hand on my heart and say that nobody suffered inappropriately
because of a lack of medical requirement.”19
17  Public hearing, 14 July 2010, page 7.
18  Defence Committee, Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1176-1179), 22 October 2003, Q 1211.
19  Defence Committee, Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1176-1179), 22 October 2003, Q 1217.
45
Previous page | Contents | Next page