Previous page | Contents | Next page
16.1  |  The welfare of Service Personnel
138.  Annex C to Dr Hutton’s briefing provided more detail on key issues, including the
sustainability of the proposed deployment. It stated:
“It remains the case that, with likely timelines for transition in Iraq, the HTF
deployment is achievable without serious damage to Harmony, though certain niche
trades and capabilities (particularly air transport) will be placed under increased,
but manageable, stress.”
139.  The decision to deploy to Helmand was approved in Cabinet on 26 January.94
The minutes record that Dr Reid “was looking carefully at where the burden on our
troops could be reduced, including in Iraq and Bosnia and hoped to be able to report
troop and cost reductions in coming months”.
140.  There were different views within the MOD over the effect of the deployment
on personnel. Lt Gen Palmer, DCDS(Personnel) from 2002 to August 2005, told the
Inquiry that, as he left post, he expressed his concern that deploying two brigades
simultaneously (to Iraq and Afghanistan) would breach the Harmony Guidelines and
the Defence Planning Assumptions, and was “too big a risk”.95
141.  Sir Kevin Tebbit, MOD Permanent Under Secretary from 2001 to 2005, told
the Inquiry:
“I was apprehensive [about the deployment of UK forces to Helmand] and I made
my concerns known to my planning staff and to the Chiefs of Staff. I think their
view was that they could do it and it was manageable … since it was [the Chiefs
of Staff] who would actually have to ensure they could do this, I did not press my
objections fully.”96
142.  The impact of the decision on the availability of key equipment capabilities for Iraq
is addressed in Section 14.1.
143.  UK troops began to deploy to Helmand in May 2006.
Concern that the Army is “running hot”, autumn 2006
144.  In August 2006, concerns emerged over the treatment of injured Service Personnel
being treated on civilian wards at Selly Oak hospital in the UK, and the adequacy of
the welfare package provide to them and their families. The concerns are described
in Section 16.2.
94  Cabinet Conclusions, 26 January 2006.
95  Public hearing, 21 July 2010, page 80.
96  Public hearing, 3 February 2010, pages 15 and 16.
27
Previous page | Contents | Next page