Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
assessment is that it is more a question of when there is a fatality amongst our
diplomatic staff, rather than if. This assumption needs to be shared or challenged
by the risk owners.”290
425.  The main findings included:
Significant deterioration in the security of UK posts: in Basra, because of
insufficient military protection; in Baghdad, because of the increasing threat
from extremists.
An increasing threat of kidnap. FCO security officials were looking at providing
key staff with transponders to detect their location in case they were captured.
The SOSA’s judgement that senior staff were facing “undue political pressure to
‘produce the goods’ which could lead to the acceptance of inappropriate levels
of risk”. Security managers and heads of close protection teams were “acting
as a constraint on senior staff movements to risky areas”.
Signs of speculation in other government departments about moving “off‑shore”
because of the “nearly impossible operating environment”.
426.  On 12 June, Sir Michael Jay updated Mrs Margaret Beckett, who had succeeded
Mr Straw as Foreign Secretary in early May 2006:
“We have always been aware of the risks of operating in Iraq. Because of the
political importance to the UK of our work in Iraq, we have judged it acceptable to
tolerate a higher level of risk there (and in southern Afghanistan) than elsewhere
in the world. But our duty of care towards our staff, and towards those from other
government departments who work in our posts, remains.
“We invest considerable resources in reducing as far as is possible the risk to our
staff, and all those for whom we are responsible. We have in place robust structures
to manage and mitigate risk, which are subject to constant review, in response to
changes in the situation on the ground. We recognise, however, that there remains
a residual level of risk in operating in such an extreme environment, against which
we cannot wholly protect ourselves.” 291
427.  Sir Michael listed the four conditions for any FCO member of staff working in Iraq:
All staff must be volunteers;
They must be fully aware of the security risks;
We must do all we reasonably can to reduce the risks they face;
Conditions on the ground must be such that staff are able to do their jobs
effectively.”
290  Minute Noble to Casey, 6 June 2006, ‘Security of our Posts in Baghdad and Basra’.
291  Minute Jay to Foreign Secretary, 12 June 2006, ‘Iraq: Security of Our Posts in Baghdad and Basra’.
318
Previous page | Contents | Next page