The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
assessment
is that it is more a question of when there is a fatality amongst
our
diplomatic
staff, rather than if. This assumption needs to be shared or
challenged
425.
The main
findings included:
•
Significant
deterioration in the security of UK posts: in Basra, because
of
insufficient
military protection; in Baghdad, because of the increasing
threat
from extremists.
•
An
increasing threat of kidnap. FCO security officials were looking at
providing
key staff
with transponders to detect their location in case they were
captured.
•
The SOSA’s
judgement that senior staff were facing “undue political pressure
to
‘produce
the goods’ which could lead to the acceptance of inappropriate
levels
of risk”.
Security managers and heads of close protection teams were
“acting
as a
constraint on senior staff movements to risky areas”.
•
Signs of
speculation in other government departments about moving
“off‑shore”
because of
the “nearly impossible operating environment”.
426.
On 12 June,
Sir Michael Jay updated Mrs Margaret Beckett, who had
succeeded
Mr Straw
as Foreign Secretary in early May 2006:
“We have
always been aware of the risks of operating in Iraq. Because of
the
political
importance to the UK of our work in Iraq, we have judged it
acceptable to
tolerate a
higher level of risk there (and in southern Afghanistan) than
elsewhere
in the
world. But our duty of care towards our staff, and towards those
from other
government
departments who work in our posts, remains.
“We invest
considerable resources in reducing as far as is possible the risk
to our
staff, and
all those for whom we are responsible. We have in place robust
structures
to manage
and mitigate risk, which are subject to constant review, in
response to
changes in
the situation on the ground. We recognise, however, that there
remains
a residual
level of risk in operating in such an extreme environment, against
which
we cannot
wholly protect ourselves.” 291
427.
Sir Michael
listed the four conditions for any FCO member of staff working in
Iraq:
“•
All staff
must be volunteers;
•
They must
be fully aware of the security risks;
•
We must do
all we reasonably can to reduce the risks they face;
•
Conditions
on the ground must be such that staff are able to do their
jobs
effectively.”
290
Minute
Noble to Casey, 6 June 2006, ‘Security of our Posts in Baghdad and
Basra’.
291
Minute Jay
to Foreign Secretary, 12 June 2006, ‘Iraq: Security of Our Posts in
Baghdad and Basra’.
318