The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
211.
Sir Hilary
Synnott told the Inquiry:
“One of my
key requests was at the end of August when I asked for, I
think,
37
additional expert staff, not generalists but experts, and 20
armoured vehicles.
I was sent
the record of the Ad Hoc Ministerial Committee [on 28 August], I
think
within a
day of this, and it was recorded there that Synnott should be
provided
with
everything he thought was necessary. That, to my mind, clearly came
from
No.10 and
that was the pattern throughout. The difficulty, however, was
turning
that
political imperative into reality … I put in this bid at the end of
August. The task
was
ultimately given to DFID. I understood that in October they put out
a trawl with
a deadline
of, I think, the end of October for recruitment. By 1 January, 18
out of
212.
Mr Jim
Drummond, DFID Iraq Director from September 2003 to December
2004,
described
DFID’s role to the Inquiry:
“Sir Hilary
Synnott, working with us, identified, I think it was 37 posts that
he wanted
to have
filled, and we agreed to do that.
“We asked
the Crown Agents to source those people from the market,
because
we didn’t
at that stage across government have a pool of people that could
easily
be called
upon, although the Iraq Planning Unit based in the Foreign Office
had
managed to
get quite a number of civil servants from Treasury, DFID and
across
government
into the CPA in the early days. But for Basra we were looking
really to
fund from
contractors in the market, partly because we were looking for
specialist
skills in
project implementation that we don’t necessarily have full‑time in
DFID.” 147
213.
Mr Drummond
explained that some of the jobs were advertised across DFID,
but
“mostly
they were people who came from the market”. People had arrived in
slightly
greater
numbers after Christmas because those selected in December had
asked for
their
contracts to start on 1 January.
214.
During his
farewell meeting with Mr Straw on 11 February 2004,
Sir Hilary Synnott
said he had
been frustrated at the length of time it had taken the FCO to
deploy people
and provide
secure communications. The FCO response had compared
unfavourably
with that
of other departments.148
215.
Sir Hilary
told the Inquiry that Whitehall departments’ interpretation of
their duty
of care
towards civilian personnel had been an obstacle to the recruitment
of the people
he
needed:
“I raised
it with the Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, and we both of us
thought that it
was a bit
odd that our men and women in the armed forces could be exposed to
risk.
But … we
could not risk injury or death to civilians …
146
Public
hearing, 9 December 2009, page 45.
147
Public
hearing, 17 December 2009, pages 10‑12.
148
Minute Owen
to PS/PUS [FCO], 12 February 2004, ‘FCO Response to
Iraq’.
280