Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
846.  The SDR stated that a range of advanced systems were planned or already
entering service, including the airborne ground surveillance radar, Astor, and a battlefield
unmanned target acquisition vehicle, Phoenix.
847.  The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter in 2002 reiterated that ISTAR
was a key element of the MOD’s network‑centric capability.452 It stated that the US had
demonstrated in Afghanistan the effectiveness of such systems in providing persistent
surveillance without putting aircrew lives at risk: “Our Watchkeeper project has the same
purpose; and we intend to accelerate the programme.”
848.  The Watchkeeper programme was initiated to address the capability gap for a
tactical UAV that could provide operational commanders with a persistent, all‑weather
ISTAR capability.
849.  On 7 January 2004, Lt Gen Fulton told the House of Commons Defence
Committee that Watchkeeper was “due in service in 2005‑06”.453
850.  The Government’s Response to the Committee’s report on 8 June stated that the
main investment decision was “due later in 2004”, at which point a formal In Service
Date (ISD) would be set.454
851.  That date was provided in the National Audit Office (NAO) report on the MOD’s
Major Projects in November 2004.455 The target date for Watchkeeper’s Main Gate
approval was December 2004 and the internal planning assumptions for its entry into
service was November 2006.
852.  A minute from Lieutenant General Andrew Ridgway, Chief of Defence Intelligence,
on 22 June 2004 indicated that Phoenix was the only UAV in service in 2003.456 It
had been procured in 1988 against a requirement to support operations in north‑west
Europe, predominantly as a target acquisition system. The system was subsequently
used in the Balkans and in Iraq.
853.  Lt Gen Ridgway wrote that it had been described as “battle winning equipment”
during the invasion and had successfully been deployed on wider surveillance roles
in addition to providing target acquisition information. Phoenix had not, however, been
designed “to operate in the extreme heat of Iraq”.
452  Ministry of Defence, The Strategic Defence Review: A New Chapter, July 2002.
453  Third Report from the House of Commons Defence Committee, Session 2003‑04, Lessons of Iraq,
HC 57‑I, para 235.
454  First Special Report of the House of Commons Defence Committee, Session 2003‑04, Lessons of Iraq:
Government Response to the Committee’s Third Report of Session 2003‑04, HC 635, para 104.
455  National Audit Office, 10 November 2004, Ministry of Defence: Major Projects Report 2004.
456  Minute CDI to APS/SofS [MOD], 22 June 2004, ‘ISTAR Provision to Op TELIC – UK UAV Operations’.
146
Previous page | Contents | Next page