Previous page | Contents | Next page
14.1  |  Military equipment (post-conflict)
239.  When asked whether he had been briefed on the threat from EFPs and the
predicted growth in the use of ever more sophisticated IED technology when he became
CJO in July 2004, ACM Torpy told the Inquiry:
“Not specifically EFPs. IEDs, yes … it was not a significant threat in 2004 when
I took over and it grew …”120
THE IMPACT OF THE 2004 SPENDING REVIEW ON FRES
240.  During September 2003, the MOD’s cash requirement for 2003/04 had risen from
£490m to £1,152m. That prompted Mr Gordon Brown, Chancellor of the Exchequer,
to impose controls on the MOD’s management of its resources. That is addressed in
Section 13.1.
241.  At the DMB on 1 October, Mr Ian Andrews, MOD Second Permanent Under
Secretary, explained that the MOD was now facing a near‑cash shortfall of £1.1bn.121
Part of the MOD’s response was to identify near‑cash reductions of £300m across the
DLO and DPA.
242.  Mr Andrews had produced a paper for the Board that set out proposals for those
reductions, all of which were accepted. One measure was to defer £13m from the FRES
programme (needed to underpin its suggested procurement strategy), which could
“delay the programme by a few months”.122
243.  Considering the Equipment Programme on 26 February 2004, the DMB was told
by Sir Kevin Tebbit that Treasury controls had rendered it “unaffordable”.123 There was
likely to be no increase in resources and there was no scope to take risks. He said that
any additional enhancements “must have compensating offsets”.
244.  The DMB discussed Mr Woolley’s paper of proposed enhancements and savings
measures, including deferring the FRES ISD by a further year to December 2011.124
The DMB said that this was a concern and frustrating:
“But there was a tension between the need for a basic vehicle relatively quickly and
a more complex capability downstream.”
245.  The Assessment Phase for the procurement of FRES was announced on 5 May
2004.125
246.  On 24 June, in the context of a wider DMB discussion about the risks of meeting
the targets on cost and time for major procurement projects, concern was expressed
120  Public hearing, 18 January 2011, page 62.
121  Minutes, 1 October 2003, Defence Management Board meeting.
122  Paper 2nd PUS, 30 September 2003, ‘In‑Year Management: AP03 update’.
123  Minutes, 26 February 2004, Defence Management Board meeting.
124  Paper Finance Director, [undated], ‘ST/EP04: Years 1 and 2’; Minutes, 26 February 2004, Defence
Management Board meeting.
125  Report MGO, 9 July 2004, ‘MGO’s Report to ECAB 2004’.
43
Previous page | Contents | Next page