Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
after deployment in order to facilitate the staffing and subsequent integration
of Urgent Operational Requirement”.
The EC Branch was “constrained in its operation due to the lack of an agreed
and authoritative Directive”. The report recommended that operational and EC
chains should “develop and agree an appropriate Directive comprising TOR
[Terms of Reference], roles and responsibilities and CONOPS”.
The Customer Two focus and procedures for the integration of UOR capabilities
deployed directly to an operational theatre was “not clear”. It cited the need to
implement the Standing Instruction from 26 November 2004.
88.  In his statement for the Inquiry, Air Chief Marshal Sir Glenn Torpy, CJO from July
2004 to March 2006, described the role of PJHQ as:
“… to act as the interface between the in‑theatre force and the MOD and Front Line
Commands (FLC), particularly in ensuring that the in‑theatre force is provided with
the wherewithal to deliver its objectives. This required a constant dialogue at every
level, between the MOD, PJHQ, FLC and in‑theatre force.”39
89.  ACM Torpy wrote that he had “inherited a Joint force structure … that was
appropriately sized to deliver the military objectives” he had been given; and that the
in‑theatre commanders, including the GOC MND (SE), were required to conduct a Force
Level Review every six months to “validate their force requirements”. Those reviews
were “undertaken in consultation with the PJHQ” and “presented to the CDS (and the
Chiefs of Staff) for endorsement”. That “imposed an important level of discipline” and
“provided the vehicle for force level increases if conditions in a particular component
demanded additional capability”.
90.  On 10 October 2006, the extent to which capability gaps were being anticipated
in UK theatres was raised by General Sir Timothy Granville‑Chapman, Vice Chief of
Defence Staff, following a meeting about helicopter availability in Afghanistan.40
91.  On 27 October, Gen Granville‑Chapman’s Private Office wrote to Lieutenant
General Nicholas Houghton, CJO, requesting a report on “how effective we currently
are and how we might be more so” in predicting emerging capability requirements and
reporting these back to the UK after “the recent debate on what capabilities are needed
for operations” had “thrown the spotlight” on the issue.41
39  Statement, 14 June 2010, pages 4‑6.
40  Minute Granville‑Chapman to ACDS(Ops), 10 October 2006, ‘Helicopter Availability’.
41  Minute MA/VCDS to MA/CJO, 27 October 2006, ‘Theatre Articulation of Capability Requirements’.
18
Previous page | Contents | Next page