Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
63.  Lt Gen Reith sent an assessment of the threat in the UK’s Area of Operations to
Admiral Sir Michael Boyce, CDS, on 29 March.26 In his covering minute, Lt Gen Reith
wrote that predictions about the latter stages of Phases III and IV were “more difficult to
ascertain” and they largely depended on “the progress of the Coalition campaign, forces
assigned to security tasks, etc”. He continued:
“However, for the moment we are dealing with a spectrum of threats ranging from
regular to terrorism. As we progress operations the regular forces threat will be
eliminated and we will eventually be left with a residual terrorist threat, as is already
the case in some areas we control, such as Umm Qasr.”
64.  The assessment stated that the threat, in addition to the indirect threats posed by
surface to surface missiles, fell broadly into three categories:
Conventional forces where Coalition Forces do not hold ground and RA
[Iraqi Regular Army] forces are still deployed.
“Asymmetric forces” including Fedayeen, Ba’ath Party officials and militia,
“other regime officials”, opportunists and criminals and the dissatisfied population.
Foreign terrorists including Palestinian and “other committed Islamic groups”
and the Iraq‑based Iranian dissident group Mujahideen e Khalq (MEK) who were
“known” to operate in the South of Iraq. There was “no physical evidence of
these threats materialising as yet”.
65.  On 3 April, Lt Gen Reith produced a draft “operational concept” for Phase IV.27
He wrote that Phase IV operations would begin in southern Iraq “within days” but that
the backdrop to their implementation was “uncertain and changing”. The baseline
conditions from which they would operate were “far from clear” and “important issues”,
such as the level of military involvement, remained unresolved. While the paper detailed
the military’s potential tasks and capability, its focus was on force levels and it did not
cover equipment.
66.  The Inquiry has seen no evidence of any further comments on the draft.
67.  The record of Lord Bach’s meeting on 14 April stated:
“Phase IV UORs remain a problem. Although CJO [Lt Gen Reith] has a draft in hand,
we are still without a defined CONOPS. This limits our ability to plan for and procure
such items.”28
26  Minute Reith to PSO/CDS, 29 March 2003, ‘Iraq – The Threat Within UK’s AO’ attaching Paper
[undated], ‘Iraq – UK AO – Threat Assessment’.
27  Paper Reith, 3 April 2003, ‘Operation TELIC Phase 4 the Joint Commander’s Draft Operational
Concept’.
28  Minute APS/Min(DP) to MA/DCDS(EC), 14 April 2003, ‘Iraq: Op TELIC – UORs’.
14
Previous page | Contents | Next page