Previous page | Contents | Next page
13.2  |  Conclusions: Resources
20.  In the absence of a Cabinet Minister with overall responsibility for Iraq, leadership
on strategy rested with Mr Blair.
21.  The version of the Ministerial Code that was current in 2003 stated that it was the
responsibility of the initiating department to ensure that proposals involving expenditure
or affecting general financial policy were discussed with the Treasury before being
submitted to Cabinet or a Ministerial Committee. The result of the discussion together
with an estimate of the cost should be included in the memorandum submitted to
Cabinet or a Ministerial Committee.
Mr Brown’s discussions with Ministers on the likely
costs of the UK’s involvement in Iraq
In the months before the invasion, Treasury officials produced a series of detailed
analyses of the likely cost of intervention in Iraq, and the effect on public expenditure, for
Mr Brown. In the context of that advice, Treasury officials urged Mr Brown to intervene in
discussions on the scale of the UK’s involvement in the military campaign and on the UK’s
role in a post‑conflict Iraq.
Mr Brown had many meetings with Cabinet colleagues, including Mr Blair, in the run‑up
to the invasion. Those meetings were often one‑to‑one, and no record was taken. In the
absence of those records, the Inquiry is unable to determine whether or in what way
Mr Brown raised the issues highlighted by his officials.
22.  The detailed estimates for military conflict and post‑conflict costs produced by the
MOD and the Treasury, and the analyses of the implications of a conflict in Iraq for public
expenditure produced by the Treasury, were not sent to Mr Blair or to Ministers outside
the originating departments.
23.  Ms Clare Short, the International Development Secretary, wrote to Mr Blair on
5 February, 14 February and 5 March 2003, highlighting the potential cost of a UK
contribution to an international humanitarian assistance and reconstruction effort, and
the potential cost of pursuing an exemplary approach to the provision of humanitarian
assistance in the UK’s Area of Responsibility (AOR) in southern Iraq. She also raised the
issue in Cabinet on 27 February.
24.  On 14 March, in response to Mr Blair’s request that Mr Brown should draw up a
funding plan for Iraq, the Treasury provided a paper setting out the potential cost of a
UK contribution to an international humanitarian assistance and reconstruction effort.
25.  Detailed estimates of military costs and the analyses of the implications of a conflict
for public expenditure should have been available to Ministers on three occasions which
shaped the UK’s involvement in Iraq:
In advance of Mr Blair’s decision on 31 October 2002 that the UK should
offer a large scale land force to the US for planning purposes.
573
Previous page | Contents | Next page