Previous page | Contents | Next page
13.2  |  Conclusions: Resources
4.  The Treasury began considering the potential cost of UK involvement in Iraq in
June 2002, and produced the first estimated figure for the cost of military action in Iraq
(£2.5bn) in September 2002.
5.  The MOD sent “some indicative breakdowns” of the cost of military action to the
Treasury on 11 October1 and “ball‑park figures” for the cost of military action (up to £2bn)
to Mr Blair on 15 October, to inform his decision on whether to offer a large scale land
force to the US.2
6.  Mr Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, sent a detailed estimate of contingency
planning costs (£1.65bn) to Mr Gordon Brown, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in
mid‑December. A copy of the letter was sent to Mr Blair. That estimate covered the
cost of preparing, deploying and retrieving a military force, but not of any war‑fighting
or post‑conflict activities.
7.  The MOD produced its first estimate of military post‑conflict costs in February 2003,
just one month before the invasion. It also increased its estimated figure for the cost of
military action (to between £2.5bn and £3bn).
8.  The Treasury produced detailed analyses of the implications of a conflict in Iraq for
public expenditure in September and October 2002.
9.  Treasury officials’ advice to Mr Brown on military cost estimates and the implications
for public expenditure was timely and accurate. It repeatedly highlighted the risk that
the UK would have to maintain a significant military force in Iraq in the medium term
and challenged the MOD’s assertion that the UK could limit its financial liability for Iraq’s
post‑conflict security and reconstruction.
10.  The MOD should have produced detailed estimates of military conflict and
post‑conflict costs sooner, in order to inform consideration of options for the UK’s
engagement.
11.  Both the Treasury (from September 2002) and the Department for International
Development (DFID) (from January 2003) produced detailed and robust analyses of
potential humanitarian assistance and reconstruction costs in Iraq. Both departments
concluded that the costs could be substantial.
12.  Treasury officials’ advice to Mr Brown highlighted the risk that the UK might have to
make a significant contribution to Iraq’s reconstruction, as a key member of the Coalition
and in particular in the absence of UN cover. The UK Government expected that UN
cover would be necessary if other international partners were to provide significant
contributions to the post‑conflict effort.
1  Minute Nye to Chancellor, 11 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Decisions Nearing’.
2  Minute Hoon to Prime Minister, 15 October 2002, ‘Iraq: UK Military Options’ attaching Paper MOD,
14 October 2002, ‘Iraq: UK Contingency Planning’.
571
Previous page | Contents | Next page