Previous page | Contents | Next page
13.1  |  Resources
Funding for military operations in the post‑conflict period
Cost of the UK’s post‑conflict military presence
366.  Most of the issues raised at Mr Blair’s meeting on 6 March, including the role of the
UN, sectorisation and the nature of the UK’s post‑conflict contribution in Iraq, remained
unresolved as the invasion began (see Section 6.5).
367.  Mr Hoon and Mr Straw sent Mr Blair a joint minute on the UK military contribution
to post‑conflict Iraq on 19 March.216 The minute, copies of which were sent to Mr Brown,
Ms Short and Sir David Manning, invited agreement to five propositions including:
“In broad terms the MOD will need to draw down its scale of effort to nearer a third of
its commitment by the autumn.”
368.  That reduced commitment would equate to “a maximum of around one brigade, a
two star headquarters and possibly a contribution to higher level command and control,
air and maritime components, and support enablers”.
369.  The joint minute gave little detail of what UK forces would be required to do
immediately after the invasion:
“The expectation is that UK forces would be responsible for a task focused on Basra
and other key military objectives in the south east of Iraq … This task is broadly
proportionate to the size of the UK’s contribution to overall Coalition land forces …”
370.  The joint minute stated that US planning remained “sensibly flexible” once the
initial phase was over and “a major part of Iraq has been stabilised”. It would be
premature to take a view on the merits of sectorisation for that stage.
371.  Mr Rycroft informed the FCO and the MOD on 21 March that Mr Blair agreed to the
Straw/Hoon recommendations, subject to further urgent advice on the size of any UK
sector, the duration of the UK commitment and the exit strategy.217
372.  Mr Dodds provided advice to Mr Brown on the joint minute on 24 March.218
Mr Dodds reported that the picture looked “rather different to that presented in the
correspondence”:
“The Defence Chiefs say that a ‘medium size’ deployment (ie 10,000‑15,000) is the
most we could sustain in the medium term without lasting damage to our forces.
MOD officials tell us they had intended the submission [the joint minute] to pose the
question ‘do you want us to do as much as we can (ie this medium size deployment)
216 Minute Straw and Hoon to Prime Minister, 19 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UK Military Contribution to
Post‑Conflict Iraq’.
217 Minute Rycroft to McDonald and Watkins, 21 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UK Military Contribution to
Post‑Conflict Iraq’.
218 Minute Dodds to Chancellor, 24 March 2003, ‘Iraq: UK Military Contribution to Post‑Conflict Iraq’.
503
Previous page | Contents | Next page