Previous page | Contents | Next page
13.1  |  Resources
208.  Ms Short said that work on post‑conflict issues needed to be taken forward
urgently and emphasised the need for extra resources, the potential effect of chemical
and biological weapons on civilians and the importance of involving the UN.
209.  Summarising the discussion, Mr Blair said that the “priorities for the immediate
future” included preparatory work on planning the aftermath of any military action.
210.  On 21 January, at Ms Short’s request, Mr Fernie provided advice on “how to
maximise the chances of securing additional funding from the Treasury to cover the
costs of [a] DFID humanitarian response”.136
211.  Mr Fernie recommended that Ms Short should speak, rather than write, to
Mr Brown. A letter would invite a formal response, and Treasury officials were likely
to caution Mr Brown against providing any broad assurance on funding and might
recommend that DFID “unpick” its 2003/04 spending plan, to be agreed shortly, in
order to provide more funding for Iraq.
212.  Mr Fernie continued:
“Mr [Mark] Lowcock’s [DFID Director Finance and Corporate Performance] advice
is that the best time to extract maximum funds from the central Reserve is when
the political pressure is at its height. We might guess that such a time will come in
a month or so – by which time budgets for our existing programmes would be more
secure, with our 2003/04 framework finalised and on its way to publication.”
213.  Ms Short commented: No – I don’t want to ring Ch X [the Chancellor of the
Exchequer] … I wanted to put humanitarian considerations into Gov[ernment] mind not
just to squeeze some money.”137 Rather than write or speak to Mr Brown, she would
write to Mr Blair. That letter was sent on 5 February.
214.  Ms Short described DFID’s preparations to respond to a humanitarian crisis in Iraq
in the House of Commons on 30 January.
215.  Ms Short’s briefing for the debate included, at her request, a figure for the
UK’s “responsibility within the international system” for contributing to humanitarian
relief efforts.138 The briefing stated that the UK’s Gross National Income (GNI) was
5.5 percent of the total GNI of members of the Organisation for Economic Co‑operation
and Development (OECD) in 2000. The UK would not expect to contribute much more
than that percentage to any international humanitarian relief effort.
136 Minute Fernie to PS/Secretary of State [DFID], 21 January 2003, ‘Iraq Contingency Planning:
Financial Provision’.
137 Manuscript comment Short, 22 January 2003, on Minute Fernie to PS/Secretary of State [DFID],
21 January 2003, ‘Iraq Contingency Planning: Financial Provision’.
138 Minute Fernie to PS/Secretary of State [DFID], 28 January 2003, ‘Iraq: Contingency Planning –
Commons Debate on Thursday’ attaching Briefing, [undated], ‘House of Commons Opposition Debate,
Thursday 30 January 2003: Humanitarian Contingency Planning in Iraq’.
477
Previous page | Contents | Next page