Previous page | Contents | Next page
13.1  |  Resources
99.  Mr Brown told the Inquiry that all the MOD’s claims for UORs had been met.77
He also explained that the “ceiling” was not a limit on UOR expenditure, but an estimate
of likely expenditure:
“At all times we said, ‘Here is the money … Once you have spent that, then we are
prepared – and always were ready to and actually did – deliver more.’”
100.  Mr Tom McKane, MOD Director General Resources and Plans from September
2002 to January 2006, who was responsible for establishing the arrangements for
securing funding for UORs in the period leading up to the invasion, told the Inquiry that
he was satisfied with the Treasury’s response to the MOD’s requests for UORs:
“Inevitably … there is an anxiety and a concern on the part of the Ministry of
Defence to get on with things … and it did take a month or so after my first
engagement in this for the agreements [on UORs] to be reached … But thereafter,
the process operated smoothly.
“There were some, I think, who were probably frustrated at the fact … that we were
given tranches of money … we would get quite quickly to the point where we had
exhausted the first tranche and were then involved in the preparation of ministerial
correspondence to secure the release of the next tranche …
“… but I don’t remember it [the use of tranches] being a major obstacle to the
preparations.”78
101.  The provision of military equipment, including UORs, is described in Sections 6.3
and 14.
102.  Mr Nye advised Mr Brown on 11 October that Mr Hoon was expected to write to
Mr Blair shortly, setting out the military forces required for a campaign.79 The Treasury
had now established good communications with the MOD, and MOD officials had
assured the Treasury that Mr Blair would be presented with “cost information”.
103.  While there were still huge uncertainties involved in forecasting costs, the MOD
had provided the Treasury with “some indicative breakdowns” which the Treasury was
scrutinising. The MOD estimated that Package 2 (predominantly air and maritime forces)
was likely to cost up to £1bn, and Package 3 (Package 2 plus ground forces) between
£1.5bn and £2bn.
104.  Mr Nye invited Mr Brown to “consider whether the extra political impact for the UK
of Package 3 merits the additional £0.5bn to £1bn cost (and of course the additional risk
to British troops)”.
77 Public hearing, 5 March 2010, page 94.
78 Public hearing, 2 July 2010, pages 35-36.
79 Minute Nye to Chancellor, 11 October 2002, ‘Iraq: Decisions Nearing’.
461
Previous page | Contents | Next page