Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.2  |  Development of UK strategy and options, September 2000 to September 2001
185.  The note concluded:
“Whatever we do, we need to move to ‘smarter’ (but better enforced) sanctions and
recapture the moral high ground. We cannot achieve complete WMD disarmament,
but we should aim to contain Iraqi activity: UNMOVIC may be the best way of doing
this, but there are downsides to having UNMOVIC in Iraq and, anyway, Saddam is
unlikely to agree to their presence on Iraqi territory.”
186.  Sir John Sawers told the Inquiry that, in relation to regime change:
“A lot of these ideas were modelled on the successful policy that we had been
pursuing in relation to Serbia and President Milosevic. All these elements, a contract
with the Serbian people, information flows, indictments of the leader and support for
the opposition had brought down President Milosevic a few months earlier, it was
successful regime change policy.”102
187.  Mr Cook’s Private Office wrote to No.10 on 20 February, advising that Mr Cook
agreed with much of the Cabinet Office note of 15 February but that he was “concerned
that it reflected military priorities at the expense of broader diplomatic and political
issues”.103 In his view, the Iraqi risk to Kuwait if patrolling ceased in the southern NFZ
was overstated: “Saddam should be in no doubt that should he move against Kuwait,
the US/UK response would be massive.” Mr Cook also questioned the suggestion in
the note that the alternative to the southern NFZ would be a need to station up to three
additional armoured brigades in Kuwait. He believed the UK should strongly discourage
the US from more active patrolling and advised that the UK should keep its distance
from the US policy of supporting Iraqi opposition groups in exile.
188.  Mr Cook concluded: “Ultimately, however robust our military planning, our policy
can succeed only if there is a degree of international consensus.”
189.  Mr Cook also asked to speak to Mr Blair to discuss the line he would take at
Camp David.
190.  The Inquiry has not seen a record of a conversation between Mr Blair and Mr Cook
on Iraq at this time.
No.10’s advice
191.  Mr Sawers advised Mr Blair on 16 February that there was “one piece of hard
policy to discuss with President Bush and Colin Powell”: Iraq.104 The US had started a
policy review and wanted to “get a new policy in place in the next month”. No decisions
were yet needed, but Mr Sawers suggested Mr Blair would want to familiarise himself
with the subject as President Bush would ask for his views.
102  Public hearing, 10 December 2009, page 11.
103  Letter Sedwill to Sawers, 20 February 2001, ‘Iraq: Policy Review’.
104  Minute Sawers to Prime Minister, 16 February 2001, ‘Iraq: Policy Review’.
227
Previous page | Contents | Next page