Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.2  |  Conclusions: Security Sector Reform
99.  During the summer of 2005, there is evidence that UK officials were not clear
about their departments’ role within the SSR effort and felt disconnected from what was
happening on the ground. That was exemplified in June when DFID commissioned
a consultant to assist the FCO in drawing together a cross‑Whitehall strategy for UK
support to the development of Iraqi policing capacity. The FCO, the MOD and DFID
struggled to reach an agreement on what the strategy should say and acknowledged
they simply did not know whether policing was on track or not.
100.  Lieutenant General Robin Brims, SBMR‑I, reported in July that, although the Iraqi
Army was steadily increasing in confidence, it did not yet have the ability to conduct
complex operations. The police were lagging behind the army and were of doubtful
quality but plans were in place to address that.
101.  Mr Blair saw Lt Gen Brims’ report and sought an honest assessment of the
progress of Iraqiisation, which suggests a lack of confidence in the MOD’s reporting.
Dr John Reid, the Defence Secretary, admitted that there was still a focus on quantity
rather than quality in stating “numerically, generation of ISF remains on track, but
significant development in key capability areas is still needed”.57
102.  The information on ISF numbers also masked other issues. In September, an
FCO transition plan for the IPS showed, when compared with earlier MOD papers, that
the overall figure of 55 percent of police trained masked considerable variations across
MND(SE) – although 90 percent of personnel in Dhi Qar province had received training,
the figures for Muthanna and Basra were considerably lower (40 percent and 42 percent
respectively).
103.  Mr Blair expressed his concerns about ISF capability, following reports of police
involvement in attacks on the Multi‑National Forces in Basra. But despite concerns that
had been expressed about the capacity of the ISF, Dr Reid recommended a reduction in
UK forces should take place in October or November of 2005.
104.  A few days after Dr Reid made his recommendation the Jameat incident in Basra
on 19 September raised questions about the ISF in MND(SE). Officials from the FCO,
the MOD and DFID judged that the incident had highlighted the risks to achieving UK
objectives in MND(SE), and that those risks had implications for military resources.
Nevertheless, assumptions about ISF readiness were not re‑examined by Ministers.
Reluctance to consider the potential implications of the Jameat incident obscured what
it had revealed about the security situation in MND(SE).
105.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald, Mr Blair’s Foreign Policy Adviser, wrote: “It is clear that we
need to review whether our police training strategy in the South‑East is working, and
whether the national policing strategy knits together.”58 Sir Nigel reported that Mr Blair
had agreed that Sir Ronnie Flanagan, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary,
57 Minute Reid to Blair, 28 August 2005, ‘Update on progress of the Iraqi security forces (ISF)’.
58 Letter Sheinwald to Hayes, 4 October 2005, ‘Iraq Strategy’.
433
Previous page | Contents | Next page