Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.2  |  Conclusions: Security Sector Reform
13.  Even though officials had warned that knowledge of conditions within Iraq was
incomplete, it was assumed that Iraq would have a functioning criminal justice system
and security forces which, after the removal of Ba’athist leadership, would have the
capacity to play their part in its reconstruction.
14.  It was unclear how the international SSR effort would be co‑ordinated and therefore
what contribution the UK would make.
Occupation
15.  Immediately after the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime there was widespread looting
by the Iraqi population, including in Baghdad and Basra. As described in Section 9.8,
UK forces in Basra were not given instructions by their commanders in the UK on how to
deal with it.
16.  Brigadier Graham Binns, commanding the 7 Armoured Brigade which had taken
Basra City, concluded that “the best way to stop looting was just to get to a point where
there was nothing left to loot”.7
17.  As the need for a functioning police force to control lawless behaviour became
increasingly apparent, there remained no strategy for SSR.
18.  Officials from the Department for International Development (DFID) reported that the
Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (ORHA) had drawn up extensive
plans for SSR but that those had been disregarded by the US and Coalition military.
19.  The UK recognised that an SSR strategy was needed. On 24 April, the AHMGIR
agreed that the UK should lobby the US to create a “comprehensive strategy”, and to
involve UK personnel in ORHA scoping studies.
20.  A paper produced for the AHMGIR on 8 May indicated that the UK’s approach
continued to be based on the assumption that “the UK will neither be required nor able
to develop an independent policy on SSR in Iraq”.8 The UK’s immediate priorities were
therefore to influence the development of US policy, recognising that:
“Reform across the full range of security activities (armed forces, intelligence
agencies, justice and law enforcement institutions) is an essential element of the
overall Coalition strategy to establish a united and representative Iraqi Government
and to create the conditions under which the Coalition can eventually disengage.”
7 Private hearing, 2 June 2010, page 11.
8 Paper IPU, May 2003, ‘Iraq – Security Sector Reform’.
417
Previous page | Contents | Next page