Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.1  |  Security Sector Reform
719.  A junior DFID official emailed the FCO on 14 July to say that DFID felt that the
strategy could not be agreed across Whitehall.657 He wrote: “We see your paper as
something that we have tried very hard to inform and influence, but have failed. It’s way
off something that we would wish to put our name to.” He suggested that it was instead
presented as an FCO‑led document.
720.  On the same day, Commander Simon Huntingdon, MOD, emailed the FCO to say
that the MOD also did not feel the strategy represented an agreed FCO, DFID and MOD
position on policing in Iraq.658
721.  On 18 July, MOD, DFID and FCO officials met to discuss policing in Iraq.659 They
agreed that the strategy could not be viewed as “complete and usable” until additional
information was sent by the British Embassy. The minutes recorded:
“In the meantime, we should avoid giving the impression that policing was on track
when the reality was that we did not know.”
722.  The group agreed that a background paper on the strategy should be submitted
to senior officials on 22 July and possibly to Ministers afterwards. A second
cross‑departmental paper would be submitted by the end of August outlining the
intended “end state” for the IPS, including “a route map of how to get there”, an analysis
of the risks (such as the sustainability of policing) and “an indication of the resources
required”. While the FCO accepted that it led policing activity in Iraq, it “stressed” the
need for all relevant departments to agree the papers; there was a “shared responsibility
for delivering policing”.
723.  Commenting on the draft background paper, an FCO junior official described
policing as “the Cinderella of SSR”.660 The “reasons/factors” for that included:
“The insurgency broke the original plan, but no‑one was prepared to admit it.”
“The international policing community has not responded adequately to Iraq” –
even the reduced figure of 1,500 (from 6,000) International Police Liaison
Officers (IPLOs) had not been achieved.
As the US was “the monopoly supplier of assets and people”, its “military vision
[had] prevailed”.
“The original vision of the Iraqi police force as a community based service is
(and was) idealistic pie‑in‑the‑sky. It does not fit with the culture or environment.”
The Iraqis were seeking to balance the police against the army to prevent
a coup.
657  Email DFID [junior official] to FCO [junior official], 14 July 2005, ‘Cover note to Strategy Group’.
658  Email Huntingdon to FCO [junior official], 14 July 2005, ‘Police Cross‑Departmental Strategy’.
659  Minutes FCO, 18 July 2005, ‘Cross‑Departmental Meeting on Policing in Iraq – 18 July 2005’.
660  Email FCO [junior official] to FCO [junior official], 21 July 2005, ‘Background paper on police’.
217
Previous page | Contents | Next page