Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
of government and the state.545 Dr Allawi made clear that tackling the security situation
was his top priority, but he lacked effective resources to achieve that. He “needed:
the two mechanised divisions, a Rapid Deployment Force,546 an effective anti‑terrorist
capability in the police, and a more rapid build up of intelligence capability”. Mr Blair
commissioned advice from Lt Gen McColl on how best to meet that requirement.
605.  On 20 September, Mr Naworynsky provided two papers to No.10: “one
on the current status of the ISF, including an analysis of the Petraeus Plan and
recommendations for further work”; and a speaking note for Mr Blair’s next conversation
with President Bush.547
606.  The first paper listed the current capability of the ISF as 91,000 recruited and
trained personnel, comprising:
34,500 police;
34,200 members of the National Guard;
14,300 border officers;
4,800 regular army;
1,900 Army Intervention Force; and
600 Special Forces.
607.  Those forces were “totally reliant on the Multi‑National Force (MNF) for support”
and “turning quantity into quality – the key to our withdrawal” would “take time”.
608.  The Petraeus Plan had forecast that by the end of 2005, total ISF strength would
be 234,000 and it would be “able to tackle the majority of threats currently present
in Iraq”. The paper noted that that was ambitious but would in time deliver security
forces to meet Iraq’s predicted needs. It could be accelerated to deliver more forces
with counter‑insurgency capability sooner, but only by taking resources from long‑term
development, and so ultimately extending the length of the programme and the presence
of UK forces in Iraq. The paper stated: “This would not be desirable.”
609.  The paper stated that the UK could complement the Petraeus Plan by: continuing
to support the MOI and IMOD; procuring equipment for the ISF in MND(SE); continuing
training and mentoring the ISF; supporting NATO training of the middle and senior ranks
and “consider whether the ISF require a heavy force”.
610.  Sir Nigel Sheinwald annotated the covering letter: “This is v. feeble”.548
545  Letter Sheinwald to Adams, 19 September 2004, ‘Iraq: Prime Minister’s Meeting with Prime Minister
Allawi, Sunday 19 September’.
546 A Rapid Deployment Force is a military formation typically consisting of elite military units and usually
trained at a higher intensity than the rest of their country’s military.
547  Letter Naworynsky to Quarrey, 20 September 2004, ‘Advice for the Prime Minister’s Next VTC with
President Bush’.
548  Manuscript comment Sheinwald on Letter Naworynsky to Quarrey, 20 September 2004, ‘Advice for the
Prime Minister’s Next VTC with President Bush’.
188
Previous page | Contents | Next page