Previous page | Contents | Next page
12.1  |  Security Sector Reform
Training the Iraqi Army
Training of individual army recruits followed one of two patterns:
Recruits with former military experience went into a Direct Recruit Replacement
programme. They received three weeks’ standardised training delivered by the
Major Subordinate Commands at Regional Training Centres.
Recruits without military experience were sent for training at the Iraqi Training
Brigade in Kirkush. All new recruits undertook a five‑week programme followed
by an additional three to seven weeks of specialist skills training.527 The
five‑week programme was increased to 13 weeks in early 2007.528
In 2006, a system of six Regional Training Centres was established to develop a
non‑commissioned officer corps and a year‑long Basic Officers Commissioning Course,
based on a Sandhurst curriculum, was established at three Military Academies.529
By early 2007, a National Defence University had been established and was beginning
to run institutions of professional development: Iraqi Staff Colleges, a National Defence
College and a Strategic Studies Institute.530
In May 2007, the Iraqi Training and Doctrine Command, part of the Joint Headquarters
assumed responsibility from MNSTC‑I for training and equipping the Iraqi military.531
UK assessments of the Iraqi Security Forces in late 2004
584.  On 23 September, Lieutenant General John McColl, SBMR‑I, sent Lt Gen Fry,
Deputy Chief of the Defence Staff (Commitments) from July 2003 to March 2006, a
paper on the UK’s options for withdrawing or reducing the number of troops in Iraq “up
to and beyond January 2006” (see Section 9.3).532 He stated that the IPS would have
manned, trained and equipped “77 percent” of the target 135,000 officers by the end of
July 2005 and the ING numbers were also “on course” to be achieved by that date. Lt
Gen McColl wrote that “these encouraging projections have, in part, prompted MNF‑I’s
aspiration to establish Iraqi regional … control across all 18 provinces by 31 July 2005”.
585.  Lt Gen McColl considered the goal “challenging” because of “significant shortfalls
in logistics capability” of the ISF. He highlighted a lack of trained staff, a “serious rift”
between the MOI and IMOD and “the need for a proper national security headquarters”.
527  Report to Congress, 13 October 2005, Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq.
528  Report to Congress, 2 March 2007, Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq.
529  Report to Congress, 17 February 2006, Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq.
530  Report to Congress, 2 March 2007, Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq.
531  Report to Congress, 14 September 2007, Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq.
532  Minute McColl to DCDS(C), 23 September 2004, Iraq up to and Beyond January 2006 – Defining a UK
Position’.
183
Previous page | Contents | Next page