Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.1  |  UK Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
“Throughout the dispute, our aim has been a peaceful, diplomatic settlement. There
was no desire on either side of the Atlantic to use force, but it was also clear to us
throughout that Saddam Hussein only understands and respects force …
“… As Kofi Annan said in Baghdad: ‘You can achieve much by diplomacy, but you
can achieve a lot more when diplomacy is backed by firmness and force.’
“I would put it this way: with Saddam, diplomacy plus force equals success.”190
462.  Mr Blair concluded:
“Saddam Hussein has spent seven years playing for time, but has been thwarted
by the resolve of the international community. It is now clearer than ever that his
games have to stop once and for all. If they do not, the consequences should be
clear to all.”191
463.  Mr Campbell recorded that, when Cabinet discussed Iraq on 26 February,
Mr Cook said there were “really worrying signs about what UNSCOM can do. We were
pursuing a twin track approach – light at the end of the tunnel on sanctions, allied to
clear warnings if Saddam breaks the agreement.”192 Mr Blair said “he was assured
by [President] Chirac he agrees the language makes clear military action will follow if
Saddam breaks the agreement.”
RESOLUTION 1154 (1998)
464.  On 2 March, the Security Council unanimously adopted resolution 1154 (1998).193 It:
endorsed the MOU of 23 February and looked forward to its full implementation;
stressed the need for Iraq to comply with its obligations to provide access
to UNSCOM and the IAEA which was necessary for the implementation of
resolution 687;
stated that “any violation would have severest consequences for Iraq”;
reaffirmed its intention to act in accordance with the relevant provisions of
resolution 687 on the duration of prohibitions (sanctions);
noted that Iraq’s failure to comply with the relevant obligations had delayed that
action; and
decided, “in accordance with its responsibility under the Charter, to remain
actively seized of the matter, in order to ensure the implementation of this
resolution, and to secure peace and security in the area”.
465.  It is clear from the statements in the Council meeting on 2 March, made before and
after the vote, including from seven States who were not members of the Council, that
190  House of Commons, Official Report, 24 February 1998, columns 174-175.
191  House of Commons, Official Report, 24 February 1998, column 176.
192  Campbell A & Stott R. The Blair Years: Extracts from the Alastair Campbell Diaries. Hutchinson, 2007.
193  UN Security Council resolution 1154 (1998).
107
Previous page | Contents | Next page