Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.1  |  UK Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
RESOLUTION 1134 (1997)
350.  Resolution 1134 (1997), expressing the intention to impose travel restrictions in the
event that UNSCOM reported that Iraq was not in compliance with resolution 1115, was
adopted on 23 October.144
351.  The draft text which became resolution 1134 was co-sponsored by nine members
of the Council and adopted by ten votes. Five members, including three Permanent
Members, abstained – China, Egypt, France, Kenya and Russia.
352.  Resolution 1134:
reaffirmed the Security Council’s “determination to ensure” Iraq’s “full
compliance … with all its obligations under all previous resolutions”; and
reiterated the Council’s “demand that Iraq allow immediate, unconditional and
unrestricted access to the Special Commission to any site … and in particular
… fixed wing and helicopter flights throughout Iraq for all relevant purposes …
without interferences of any kind and upon such terms and conditions as may be
determined by the Special Commission”.
353.  Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the measures adopted by the Council
included:
condemning Iraq’s actions detailed in UNSCOM’s report of 6 October;
deciding that Iraq’s refusal to co-operate constituted a “flagrant violation” of its
obligations and demanding its full co-operation;
demanding that Iraq should “co-operate fully with the Special Commission in
accordance with the relevant resolutions”;
expressing the “firm intention”, if UNSCOM reported Iraq was not in compliance
with paragraphs 2 and 3 of resolution 1115, “to adopt measures which would
oblige all States to prevent without delay the entry into or transit through their
territories of all Iraqi officials and members of the Iraqi armed forces who
are responsible for or participate in instances of non-compliance … [with
the exception of] persons carrying out bona fide diplomatic assignments or
missions”; and
reaffirming its “full support for the authority of the Special Commission … to
ensure the implementation of its mandate”.
354.  The record of the discussion demonstrates serious divisions in the Council over
the approach adopted, with the UK and US speaking in strong terms about the need
for action while the members who abstained argued that the terms of the resolution
were unbalanced and unlikely to bring about a resolution of the problems faced
by UNSCOM.145
144  UN Security Council resolution 1134 (1997).
145  UN Security Council, ‘3826th Meeting Thursday 23 October 1997’ (S/PV.3826).
87
Previous page | Contents | Next page