Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.1  |  UK Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
268.  Mr Annan added that his predecessor as Secretary-General had offered him only
one piece of advice when he left office at the end of 1996:
“Watch out for the question of Iraq … It will become very important.”
Dr Albright’s Georgetown speech
269.  In a speech at Georgetown University on 26 March 1997, Dr Madeleine Albright,
the new US Secretary of State, reaffirmed that US policy in Iraq was “part of a broad
commitment to protect the security and territory of our friends and allies in the Gulf”.122
270.  Quoting President George HW Bush, Dr Albright stated that, as well as driving Iraq
out of Kuwait, the US objective in launching Operation Desert Storm in 1991 had been
to cause Iraq once again to “live as a peaceful and co-operative member of the family
of nations”. Iraq’s leaders had, however, “continued to defy the will of the international
community” and “from the outset”, chosen “denial, delay and deceit”. They had:
“… lied … blocked inspections, concealed documents, falsified evidence and
challenged UNSCOM’s clear and legitimate authority.”
271.  Dr Albright added that, following the defection of Lt Gen Kamil, it had “appeared for
a time, as if it would cause Iraq finally to accept the need for full disclosure”, but that had
not been the case and Iraq’s “refusal to co-operate fully continued”. The US would be
“unwavering”; it would “not allow Iraq to regain by stonewalling the Security Council what
it forfeited by aggression on the battlefield”. An international consensus “that Iraq should
not be allowed again to threaten international peace” had been sustained.
272.  Dr Albright stated that Iraq’s military threat to its neighbours was “greatly
diminished”, and, “As long as the apparatus of sanctions, enforcement, inspections and
monitoring” was “in place”, Iraq would “remain trapped within a strategic box”. But she
warned that it was “essential” that international resolve did not weaken:
“Containment has worked, but … the future threat has not been erased. Iraq’s
behaviour and intentions must change before our policies can change.”
273.  Iraq had:
“yet to provide convincing evidence that it has destroyed all” its chemical and
biological weapons;
“admitted loading many … [chemical and biological] agents into missile
warheads” before the Gulf Conflict;
retained “more than 7,500 nuclear scientists and technicians, as well as
technical documents related to the production of nuclear weapons”; and
“been caught trying to smuggle in missile guidance instruments”.
122  Speech, 26 March 1997, ‘SecState Albright Policy Speech on Iraq, March 26’.
71
Previous page | Contents | Next page