Previous page | Contents | Next page
1.1  |  UK Iraq strategy 1990 to 2000
67.  The resolution asked the UN Secretary-General to produce a scheme, which
became known as the “Oil-for-Food” programme, to cover those purchases, and
to monitor and supervise their equitable distribution to “all regions of Iraq” and “all
categories of the Iraqi civilian population”. The Secretary-General’s report was submitted
on 4 September, and implementation was authorised by resolution 712 (1991) adopted
on 19 September.
68.  Iraq rejected both resolutions and refused to co-operate on the grounds that the
arrangements were an infringement of Iraq sovereignty. Resolution 778 (1992), adopted
on 2 October 1992, deplored Iraq’s position “which puts its civilian population at risk”
and decided that any Iraqi funds arising from the proceeds of sale of Iraqi petroleum
or petroleum products should be transferred by Member States to the UN escrow
account. States were also to arrange to sell or purchase any petroleum or petroleum
products owned by Iraq and transfer the proceeds to the escrow account; to contribute
funds from other sources as soon as possible. The resolution stated that no further
Iraqi assets should be released for the purchase of food stuffs, medicines and other
essential supplies except to the escrow account or directly to the UN for humanitarian
activities in Iraq.
69.  By late 1993, differences had emerged within the Security Council over the
conditions for lifting sanctions. The US and UK took the view that sanctions could only
be lifted following Iraq’s full compliance with its obligations as set out in UN resolutions.
China, France and Russia believed that a timetable for the gradual lifting of sanctions
should be put in place as Iraq complied with UN demands.
70.  As a result of Iraq’s objections, the UN adopted resolution 986 (1995) on 14 April
1995. It directed the committee established by resolution 661 to monitor the sale of
petroleum and petroleum products exported by Iraq, with the assistance of independent
inspection agents appointed by the UN Secretary-General; and to verify that the
purchase price was “reasonable in the light of prevailing market conditions”.19 A separate
escrow account was established to finance the export to Iraq of material covered by
the resolution. In the exceptional circumstances in northern Iraq, and to ensure an
equitable distribution, the UN Inter-Agency Humanitarian Programme operating in
the Governorates of Dahuk, Erbil and Sulaymaniyah would disburse a share of the
fund. The fund was to be audited by “independent and certified public accountants”.
The UN Secretary-General was to keep the Government of Iraq “fully informed”.
71.  Iraq eventually accepted resolution 986 in May 1996, when a Memorandum of
Understanding was agreed. Following the Iraqi offensive against the Kurds in August,
implementation was suspended until December. The first shipment of food arrived in
March 1997 and the first shipment of medicines in May 1997.
19  UN Security Council resolution 986 (1995).
37
Previous page | Contents | Next page