Previous page | Contents | Next page
11.1  |  De-Ba’athification
268.  The message explained that, on 6 November, the Director General of the
de‑Ba’athification Commission had announced that a draft law on de‑Ba’athification,
consistent with Prime Minister Maliki’s National Reconciliation Plan, had been prepared
and would be sent to the Council of Representatives soon.
269.  The new law would mean that only 1,500 of the 10,302 Senior Ba’athists currently
affected would lose their jobs. Of those, only the top tier of party members would be
denied a pension. The cases of those further down the ranks would be reviewed and
those who had not been convicted of a crime would have the option of reinstatement
or retirement with a pension.
270.  UK officials explained that they would “seek to agree a few components of a ‘fair
law’ with the US and UN and lobby hard for those changes”. They would “focus on
reinforcing the underlying principle that de‑Ba’athification should be an independent
judicial process rather than a political process”.
271.  UK officials subsequently discussed five changes with US officials, who raised the
first four with Dr Chalabi.215 The proposals, which received a mixed response, were:
The de‑Ba’athification Commission should review the cases of all de‑Ba’athified
individuals.
The Commission should have a purely investigative role, passing all evidence
to a judge for criminal proceedings where justified.
The new law should not extend the remit of the Commission to civil society,
press and the media.
The Commission should produce a report for the Council of Representatives,
which would then consider its dissolution.
The article that prohibited the passing of legislation in breach of the
de‑Ba’athification Law should be removed.
272.  In November 2006, Mr John Sawers, FCO Director General, Political, wrote to
Mr Blair from Baghdad, where he had just spent three days:
“… the pace of the insurgency hasn’t slackened. The Shia put the blame squarely on
Ba’athists/Saddamists, who they think we under‑estimate. They are convinced that
the former regime’s security and intelligence officials are the driving force behind the
attacks on the coalition, the Shia, and government officials, with the aim of creating
mayhem and an opportunity for them to return to power as the only ones capable of
restoring order. The level of concern has gone up sharply, with reports of Ba’athist
intimidation on the streets of Baghdad … The relative weight of the Ba’athists in the
insurgency isn’t easy to divine, but it is clear that both the Shia and the Kurds still
fear them above all.”216
215 Email Sharif to Shokat, 10 November 2006, ‘Re: De‑Ba’athification: key components of a fair law’.
216 Minute Sawers to Prime Minister, 13 November 2006, ‘Iraq’.
51
Previous page | Contents | Next page