The Report
of the Iraq Inquiry
427.
It would
neither be necessary nor feasible to seek a mandate from Cabinet
at
each stage
of a discussion. That reinforces the importance of ensuring Cabinet
is kept
informed as
strategy evolves, is given the opportunity to raise questions and
is asked to
endorse key
decisions. Cabinet Ministers need more information than will be
available
from the
media, especially on sensitive issues of foreign and security
policy.
428.
In 2009, three
former Cabinet Secretaries197
told the House
of Lords Select
Committee
on the Constitution:
“... each
of us, as Secretary of the Cabinet, has been constantly conscious
of his
responsibility
to the Cabinet collectively and of the need to have regard to
the needs
and
responsibilities of the other members of the Cabinet (and indeed of
other
Ministers)
as well of those of the Prime Minister. That has coloured our
relationships
with Number
10 as well as those with other Ministers and their
departments.”198
429.
Lord Turnbull
told the Inquiry that Mr Blair:
“... wanted
a step change in the work on delivery and reform, which I
hope
I managed
to give him. Now ... how does the Cabinet Secretary work? You
come
in and you
are – even with the two roles that you have, head of an
organisation of
half a
million civil servants and in some sense co‑ordinating a public
sector of about
five
million people. You have to make choices as to where you make your
effort, and
I think
the policy I followed was not to take an issue over from someone to
whom
it was
delegated simply because it was big and important, but you have to
make a
judgement
as to whether it is being handled competently, whether that
particular part
is, in a
sense, under pressure, whether you think they are getting it wrong
in some
sense, or
they are missing certain important things.”199
430.
The
responsibility of the Cabinet Secretary to ensure that members of
Cabinet are
fully
engaged in ways that allow them to accept collective responsibility
and to meet their
departmental
obligations nevertheless remains.
431.
The Inquiry
has reviewed the debate that took place within the Government
and
how it
reached its decision.
432.
The
circumstances in which it was ultimately decided that there was a
legal basis
for UK
participation were far from satisfactory.
433.
It was not
until 13 March 2003 that Lord Goldsmith advised that there
was,
on balance,
a secure legal basis for military action.
197
Lord
Armstrong of Ilminster, Lord Butler of Brockwell and Lord Wilson of
Dinton.
198
Fourth
Report from the House of Lords Select Committee on the
Constitution, Session 2009‑10,
The Cabinet
Office and the Centre of Government, HL Paper
30.
199
Public
hearing, 13 January 2010, page 3.
62