Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
31.  Mr Feith recorded that a draft de‑Ba’athification policy had been considered by
the US National Security Council on 10 March. At Ambassador Bremer’s request,
implementation of the policy, which would “rid the Iraqi Government of the small group of
true believers at the top of the party and those who had committed crimes in its name”,
was delayed until his arrival in Iraq.20
32.  Ambassador Bremer wrote:
“Our concern was only the top four levels of the party membership, which the [draft]
order officially excluded from public life. These were the Ba’athist loyalists who,
by virtue of their positions of power in the regime, had been active instruments of
Saddam’s repression. Our intelligence community estimated that they amounted
to only about 1 percent of all party members or approximately 20,000 people,
overwhelmingly Sunni Arabs.”
33.  Four days after arriving in Iraq, Mr Sawers reported that there was a fear among
“ordinary people in Baghdad” that the Ba’athists could return.21 He assessed:
“ORHA have made mistakes here, appointing quite senior party figures as their
main partners in the trade and health ministries, at Baghdad University and so on.
Several political leaders I have seen say a line should be drawn at the ‘firqa’ level of
the Ba’ath Party and all those at that level and the three above should be excluded,
about 30,000 in all. This would represent between five and ten per cent of total party
membership. But it is still a lot of people and may be one level too many, at least
for now.”
34.  In one of his earliest reports to London, on 12 May Mr Sawers reported that
Dr Ahmed Chalabi’s “strong message on de‑Ba’athification strikes a chord” with the
Shia population “and will become even more potent if we don’t deal with re‑emerging
Ba’athists”.22 Dr Chalabi was a founding member of the Iraqi National Congress Party
who had formed strong links with several US Administrations.
35.  After his first meeting with Ambassador Bremer, Mr Sawers reported: “Bremer, rightly,
plans to move quickly to set out a policy on ‘de‑Ba’athification’ or ‘De‑Saddam‑isation’ as
it may now be called.”23
36.  Mr Sawers judged:
“… the issue needs addressing quickly. The question is how to define the scope
of those excluded. All agree that the top three levels of the Ba’ath … should be
banned. Our rough estimate suggests that should cover up to 5,000 people. Added
20 Bremer LP III & McConnell M. My Year in Iraq: The Struggle to Build a Future of Hope. Threshold, 2006.
21 Telegram 2 IraqRep to FCO London, 11 May 2003, ‘Iraq: What’s Going Wrong?’
22 Telegram 3 IraqRep to FCO London, 12 May 2003, ‘Iraq: Political Process’.
23 Telegram 3 IraqRep to FCO London, 12 May 2003, ‘Iraq: de‑Ba’athification’.
8
Previous page | Contents | Next page