Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
the persistent lack of co‑ordination between the Iraqi Government and
international partners, and between international partners.
151.  Staff and contractors developed a number of approaches to managing the risks
inherent in working in such an environment:
using innovative techniques to deliver projects, such as working through local
Iraqi contractors, using the military (who were more frequently able to visit
project sites) to manage and monitor projects, and helping the Ministry of
Finance to set up an office inside the International Zone in Baghdad within which
international consultants could work;
systematically tracking poor performance;
adapting delivery methods to reduce fiduciary risk; and
building clear exit strategies into projects, including dedicating significant effort
to bringing in other donors.
152.  The Inquiry recognises the dedication and skill of the staff and contractors who
worked in Iraq, often in discomfort and at personal risk.
153.  Witnesses to the Inquiry and contemporary documents identify three areas in
particular where the UK had made a significant contribution to Iraq’s reconstruction:
building Iraqi capacity at the centre of government (including the Prime
Minister’s Office and the Cabinet Office), and strengthening the linkages
between Baghdad and the provinces;
building the capacity of the provincial administration in Basra; and
building the capacity of successive Iraqi Governments to manage the economy
(including the launch of a new Iraqi currency in 2003) and engage effectively
with the International Monetary Fund.
154.  The Inquiry met a number of senior Iraqi politicians and officials, and asked
them for their views on the UK’s reconstruction effort. DFID’s focus on building Iraqi
Government capacity to plan and manage was recognised and welcomed. That was
contrasted with short‑term activities, including building schools and hospitals, which Iraq
could do for itself.
155.  In Basra, the Inquiry was told that there was little to show for the UK’s
reconstruction effort. A small number of projects were identified as continuing to have a
positive impact, including:
training in the UK delivered by the PRT;
job creation programmes supported by DFID; and
improvements to the sewerage system supported by the UK military.
552
Previous page | Contents | Next page