Previous page | Contents | Next page
10.3  |  Reconstruction: oil, commercial interests, debt relief, asylum and stabilisation policy
616.  On 14 March, Mr Straw marked Baroness Symons’ letter to Mr Simon McDonald,
his Principal Private Secretary, with the comment:
“This is really important. Please make sure it is factored into Mike O’Brien’s
discussions and that a senior official … takes a personal lead on this.”361
617.  Later that day, Mr McDonald instructed Mr Chilcott that Baroness Symons’
concerns should be factored into the IPU’s follow up to Mr O’Brien’s discussions in
Washington.362
618.  A No.10 official sent Mr Blair a note on reconstruction contracts on 15 March, at his
request.363 The note reported the conclusions of Mr O’Brien’s meeting with Mr Natsios on
13 March.
619.  Ms Hewitt spoke to Mr Natsios by telephone the following week, to lobby for UK
companies.364
620.  The Coalition began military action against Iraq on the night of 19-20 March 2003.
Influencing the Coalition Provisional Authority and the US
621.  Mr Antony Phillipson, Counsellor (Trade and Transport) at the British Embassy
Washington, summarised the effect of recent UK lobbying of the US in a report to
Mr Allan on 24 March.365 Mr Natsios had told both Mr O’Brien and Ms Hewitt that UK
companies would have the opportunity to bid for subcontracts, that USAID would
sponsor UK companies to secure the necessary security clearances, and that UK bids
for subcontracts would be welcomed. UK companies could not bid for primary contracts.
622.  Mr Phillipson reported that he had followed up those discussions with a meeting
with a USAID official, who:
“… reiterated the assurances that … Natsios had given that the UK will get a bite
at the cherry when the subcontracts came up. The US prime [contractor] would be
instructed to this effect and [the USAID official] could not be more blunt than to say
that ‘the fix is in’.”
623.  ORHA would undertake the detailed assessments of the subcontracts; it had also
been told of the need to include the UK in the process.
624.  Mr Phillipson advised that the next step was to translate that “political assurance”
into practice. The “Buy America” provisions and the inclusion of a list of US standards
and specifications in the USAID “mother contract” were a cause for concern. The best
361 Manuscript comment Straw, 14 March 2003, on Minute Symons to Straw and Hewitt, [undated],
‘Iraq: Commercial Aspects’.
362 Minute McDonald to Chilcott, 14 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Commercial Aspects’.
363 Minute Cannon to Prime Minister, 15 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Reconstruction Contracts’.
364 Observer, 23 March 2003, Hewitt begs US for Iraq deals.
365 Minute Phillipson to Allan, 24 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Contracts’.
467
Previous page | Contents | Next page