Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
312.  Mr Prentice told the Inquiry that after further discussion with the Iraqi authorities,
it was agreed that rather than proceed with the law as previously planned, the best way
to achieve the outcome needed in the time available would be to ask the Council of
Representatives to pass a legally binding resolution (rather than legislation) that would
authorise the Council of Ministers to enter into the necessary MOUs with all the non-US
coalition members.118
313.  On 21 December, Mr Brown’s Assistant Private Secretary emailed him to say that
“the way forward is crystallising around a resolution of the Iraqi Parliament (one vote
rather than three readings)”.119 A vote was expected the following day.
314.  Mr Prentice reported progress to the FCO on 24 December.120 He explained that
for Iraqi MPs, resolving the legal basis for coalition forces had been a “side show …
as they focused on how to remove their Speaker” after he made a series of insulting
statements in the chamber.
315.  Following Speaker Mashhadani’s resignation – accepted “in an almost unanimous
vote” – on 23 December, the Deputy Speaker read out a resolution which authorised
the Council of Ministers to “take all necessary measures to regulate the presence and
activities of the forces of the UK, Australia, Estonia, Romania, El Salvador and NATO
from 1 January until 31 July 2009” which was then approved by “a clear majority”.
316.  Mr Prentice recorded: “The approval of the Resolution took three minutes from
start to finish.”
317.  Mr Prentice commented that Prime Minister Maliki and his allies in the Council of
Representatives had been instrumental in ensuring that the resolution passed, reflecting
that he was in a “completely different (and much better) place” regarding the UK:
“We now have the opportunity to build on this better relationship in the transition we
see to a wider ‘normalised’ relationship with Iraq, as it recovers its full sovereignty
from 01/01/09. First we need to achieve ‘closure’ through the completion of our
remaining military tasks and the drawdown of our forces with proper pride in
their achievements. Thereafter, we should take care to retain due focus on Iraq’s
continuing strategic importance to our interests and the opportunities which will
progressively open to us here.”
318.  Mr Watkins advised Mr Hutton on 28 December that the resolution had been
ratified by the Presidency Council the previous day.121 But an exchange of letters
between the UK and Iraqi Governments “recording the GoI’s consent to UK forces’ tasks
118 Public hearing, 6 January 2008, page 45.
119 Email Catsaras to Brown, 21 December 2008, ‘Iraq Withdrawal Law Lost by 6 Votes’.
120 eGram 50868/08 Baghdad to London, 24 November 2008, ‘Iraq: Parliament Passes Resolution
Providing Legal Basis for UK Forces Beyond 2008’.
121 Minute Watkins to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 28 December 2008, ‘Iraq: Legal Basis of UK Forces’.
432
Previous page | Contents | Next page