Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The US General Accountability Office (GAO) estimated that almost US$21bn was
deposited into the DFI during the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) period, of which
US$14bn was spent.225
On 10 June 2003, the CPA issued a regulation that gave Ambassador Paul Bremer,
as “Administrator of the CPA”, authority to oversee and control the establishment,
administration and use of the DFI and to direct disbursements from the DFI “for those
purposes he determines to be for the benefit of the Iraqi people”.226
The regulation also established a Program Review Board (PRB) to develop funding
plans and make recommendations to Ambassador Bremer on expenditures from the DFI,
“in consultation with the Iraqi interim administration, when established”.
The CPA issued a further regulation on 18 June, detailing the operation of the PRB.227
Voting members of the PRB included representatives of the Iraqi Ministry of Finance and
the UK.
The Inquiry has seen the records of 60 meetings of the PRB (held between 7 June
2003 and 2 June 2004).228 Of those records, 55 list the meeting’s attendees. A UK
representative attended 41 of the 55 meetings. The UK was represented by a junior
official on 36 occasions and by a senior official on five.
In March 2004, after an international competitive bidding process, the International
Advisory and Monitoring Board (IAMB) approved the appointment of KPMG to audit DFI
activities.229 A Treasury briefing stated that the CPA had used that process to re-open
debate on the scope of the IAMB’s mandate under resolution 1483.230
The CPA signed the contract with KPMG to audit the DFI on 5 April 2004 – almost
one year after resolution 1483 and less than three months before the CPA would be
dissolved.231
KPMG delivered its first audit reports, covering oil export sales and DFI operations from
May to December 2003, to the IAMB at the end of June 2004.232
The IAMB’s response to the KPMG reports stated:
“KPMG has concluded that all known oil proceeds, reported frozen assets, and
transfers from the Oil for Food Program had been properly and transparently
accounted for in the DFI. At the same time, based on a review of KPMG reports, the
IAMB believes that CPA controls were insufficient to provide reasonable assurance
(i) for the completeness of export sales of petroleum and petroleum products for
225 US General Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Committees, July 2005, Status of funding
and reconstruction efforts.
226 Coalition Provisional Authority, Regulation No.2, 10 June 2003, Development Fund for Iraq.
227 Coalition Provisional Authority, Regulation No.3, 18 June 2003, Program Review Board.
228 Coalition Provisional Authority website, [undated], Program Review Board Minute Archive.
229 International Advisory and Monitoring Board on Iraq website, 24 March 2004, Statement by the
International Advisory and Monitoring Board on Iraq.
230 Briefing Treasury, [undated], ‘Meeting with Gary Edson, NSC – Thursday 5th February [2004]’.
231 International Advisory and Monitoring Board on Iraq website, 5 April 2004, Statement by the
International Advisory and Monitoring Board on Iraq.
232 Report KPMG, 29 June 2004, ‘Development Fund for Iraq: Statement of Cash Receipts and Payments
For the Period from 22 May 2003 to 31 December 2003 (with Independent Auditors’ Report)’.
434
Previous page | Contents | Next page