Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
633.  Mr Baker told the Iraq Strategy Group that it appeared the ruling would be
accepted by the Iraqi Government, and that 17 December was therefore still the target
for PIC.293 The MCNS would take the final decision on 9 December.
634.  In relation to the renewal of resolution 1732, Mr Baker confirmed to the Iraq
Strategy Group that “the US were aware of the implications for us of this being the
last resolution”.
635.  Mr Browne’s Assistant Private Secretary replied to MOD officials on 26 November
to record his agreement to the releases requested on 22 November, subject to it being
assessed that they no longer posed an “imperative threat” to security.294
636.  A senior government official specialising in the Middle East (2), accompanied by
colleagues, met JAM1 again on 27 November.295 The purpose of the meeting was:
to show JAM1 a draft of a possible Basra Agreement/Declaration that would
precede his release;
to discuss the progress of other OMS reconciliation talks, particularly with Gen
Mohan;
to resolve difficulties over specific releases; and
to discuss post-release contact with JAM1.
637.  JAM1’s reaction to the draft agreement was “neutral” and he agreed to reflect on
it. His immediate concern remained one of process: who would organise the agreement
and who would sign up as the leaders of Basra?
638.  The officials visited JAM1 again two days later on 29 November in order to hear
his reaction to the draft Declaration, which was positive. The RSG had also directed
that the officials should secure endorsement for MND(SE)’s training/development role
and draw on that to reach a fuller agreement to future contact. JAM1 considered that
70-80 percent of the Najaf leadership would sign up to the sort of MNF deployment
envisaged.
639.  The record of the meeting concluded:
“[JAM1]’s position is, of course, inconsistent, even schizophrenic. He has supported
our development and training agenda by deed as well as word; he says the right
things about development and governance; he draws a distinction between the view
of the ‘old men’ in Najaf: reactionary, anti-development, anti-MNF in any form, and
293  Letter Cabinet Office [junior official] to McDonald, 26 November 2007, ‘Iraq Strategy Group,
5 November’. Note: the Inquiry believes that the title of this letter refers incorrectly to a previous meeting of
the ISG.
294  Letter APS/Secretary of State [MOD] to AD1 Pol Ops PJHQ, 26 November 2007, ‘Negotiations with
JAM: latest position’.
295  Email senior government official specialising in the Middle East (2), 30 November 2007, ‘[NAME OF
OPERATION]: Meetings with [JAM1] - 27 November and 29 November’.
300
Previous page | Contents | Next page