Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.5  |  June 2006 to 27 June 2007
773.  On developments in Anbar, Mr Dowse explained that, since October 2006, Prime
Minister Maliki and the MNF had been backing an initiative where local armed tribal
groups were being allowed to assume local security responsibilities – including control
of police stations. Although it was far from finished, there were indications that AQ‑I
was feeling the pressure in Anbar. The extent of popular support for the trial opposition
to AQ‑I was difficult to gauge but Mr Dowse considered that the impact so far was
encouraging.
774.  Mr Dowse reminded Sir Nigel of the JIC’s judgement in February that the prospects
for Anbar would depend on the initiative gaining broader support among the Sunni
population. That would be difficult as long as rival groups were competing for local power
and influence. There was also a risk that, if they prevailed against AQ‑I, the Sunni tribal
forces would redirect their energies against the Iraqi Government.
775.  On 3 May, in response to a request from Sir Nigel, the Deputy Chief of the
Assessments Staff provided a minute on Lebanese Hizballah involvement in training
Shia groups in Iraq.424 It said:
“Lebanese Hizballah has well‑established links to Shia groups in Iraq …
In May 2004 MNF first reported explosives technology exclusively associated
with Hizballah (EFPs: explosively formed projectiles) being used in Iraq. More
sophisticated EFPs (using passive infra‑red initiators) appeared in December 2004.”
776.  The minute said that the arrangements put in place by Hizballah for training Iraqis
who wanted to attack the coalition were assessed to have been put in place at the
request of the Iranians. It continued:
“We assess that the main recipients of Hizballah training are Shia extremists (mainly
members of Jaysh al‑Mahdi (JAM) but also some from the Badr Organisation);
although … a small number of Iranian‑backed Sunnis may also have been trained …
Skills include small‑arms and explosives training and instruction in kidnapping,
assassination, surveillance and reconnaissance.”
777.  Mr Blair commented:
“But what are we doing about this? Why aren’t we raising it with Iran?”
778.  In early May, Ambassador Crocker visited Basra.425 Mr Tinline reported to
Ms Aldred:
“Ambassador Crocker’s fleeting visit to the REO [US Regional Embassy Office]
at Basra Palace seems to have left a very bleak impression of Basra. Rocket and
mortar attacks on the REO dominate US perceptions. Transport complications
424  Minute [Deputy Chief of Assessments Staff] to Sheinwald, 3 May 2007, ‘Iraq: Lebanese Training’
including manuscript comment Blair.
425  Letter Tinline to Aldred, 3 May 2007, ‘Basra: Weekly Report’.
145
Previous page | Contents | Next page