Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.4  |  June 2005 to May 2006
656.  Mr Patey and Mr Sawers, who was visiting Baghdad, were therefore conducting an
“immediate and intensive” round of talks with those Iraqi politicians “committed to getting
a replacement to Ja’afari” to encourage them to say that they would not support him in a
Parliamentary vote.
657.  Mr Patey judged that:
“We will need to press the parties to reach clear agreement on who they will support
if Ja’afari is removed to avoid another uncomfortably close or split vote rather than
the broad cross-party consensus necessary to give a new government of national
unity the strongest possible start in the circumstances.”
658.  Mr Patey also commented:
“… in the long run we needed to get away from reliance on sectarian based parties
and to reach out to moderates from all communities”.
659.  On 5 April, the JIC reviewed sectarianism in Iraq.316
660.  The JIC judged that ethnic and sectarian rivalries had been a feature of Iraqi
society since the foundation of the state and had been exacerbated by Saddam
Hussein’s predominantly Sunni regime. Since his removal in 2003, tensions had
resurfaced.
661.  The JIC judged that:
“I. Sectarian violence in Iraq has been increasing since mid-2005: it has intensified
in the aftermath of the Samarra mosque bombing. Much of the violence is
concentrated among the mixed populations of Baghdad and its satellite towns.
Thousands of people – both Sunni and Shia – have been displaced.
“II. Al-Zarqawi’s Al Qaida in Iraq (AQ-I) initiated the anti-Shia campaign, exploiting
existing deep-seated tensions. Although AQ-I remains dominant, some Sunni
Arab nationalist insurgents are also carrying out sectarian attacks, in response to
ordinary Sunnis’ resentment of what they see as a Shia-dominated government
backed by Iran.
“III. The public Shia response to the increasing sectarian violence has been
restrained. Grand Ayatollah al-Sistani remains an important moderating figure.
But Shia patience may be wearing thin. Further attacks on Shia shrines or leading
political and spiritual leaders, are likely, and will severely test Shia resolve.
“IV. The greatest potential for large-scale street disorder aimed at Sunnis comes
from Muqtada al-Sadr’s Jaysh al-Mahdi (JAM) militia, particularly in Baghdad where
they are in de facto control in parts of Sadr City. But the most disciplined anti-Sunni
campaign is being run by the SCIRI party’s paramilitary Badr organisation, which
316  JIC Assessment, 5 April 2006, ‘Iraq: Sectarianism’.
597
Previous page | Contents | Next page