Previous page | Contents | Next page
9.2  |  23 May 2003 to June 2004
197.  The Constitutional Convention had been postponed, and instead a Preparatory
Commission on the Constitution would be created, to advise on how the Constitutional
Convention should be established.
198.  During the meeting of the AHMGIR, officials from the FCO added that it was hoped
the Constitution would be completed by May 2004 and that elections would then follow.78
199.  Mr Hoon reported to the meeting on the video conference that had taken place
earlier in the day, observing that the US was becoming concerned that Saddam Hussein
had not yet been captured.
200.  Gen Walker, who had also taken part in the video conference, observed that “the
US appeared to have no clear plan for security in the centre”.
201.  In discussion, the (unattributed) point was made that “there was no need, at
present, to increase UK forces”. The Chair of the meeting, Mr Hoon, summed up the
discussion stating “real improvements [in security] would depend in part on progress on
political reform and reconstruction”.
202.  A telegram from Mr Sawers on 3 July containing points to follow up after the video
conference with President Bush said:
“It didn’t come up today, but our forces in the South are thinly stretched. I discussed
this with the Foreign Secretary yesterday. 3 Div will be responsible for the four
Southern provinces, as opposed to the two covered by 1 Div. We will have less than
10,000 troops to cover Basra and Maysan and provide a reserve for any problems in
the other two provinces …
“It is not for me to recommend how many forces we need for our mission. But I
expect the task facing our forces to get more difficult over the summer … Seen from
here, we would be better off putting extra capability in place now than rather than
risking being exposed by events.”79
203.  Sir David Manning marked the telegram for Mr Blair to see, and wrote “Reinforces
my worries about troop numbers” on the document. Mr Blair replied “Can’t we leave
10,000 in + at least bolster with foreign troops”.
204.  A telegram from the IPU in London to Mr Sawers in Baghdad on 7 July stated
“we are pleased with the progress on the Governing Council … and continue to attach
importance to a clearly articulated vision statement and a calendar against which Iraqis
and the international community can judge us”.80
78  Minutes, 3 July 2003, Ad Hoc Group on Iraq Rehabilitation meeting.
79  Telegram 64 Sawers to FCO London, 3 July 2003, ‘Personal: Iraq: Follow up to the Bush/Blair VTC’,
including Manuscript Comments Manning and Blair.
80  Telegram 27, FCO London to IraqRep, 7 July 2003, ‘Iraq: Priorities’.
237
Previous page | Contents | Next page