10.2 |
Reconstruction: July 2004 to July 2009
990.
The
Stabilisation Unit (formerly the Post-Conflict Reconstruction Unit
– PCRU)
undertook a
review of the Basra PRT in August, at the request of the FCO. The
aim of
the review
was to:
•
assess
whether the PRT’s objectives remained valid in the light of
developments
since the
Charge of the Knights; and
•
evaluate
the PRT’s performance.582
991.
The “primary
purpose” of the review was to ensure that the PRT functioned to
its
full
potential and delivered “tangible and sustainable benefits” over
the next 12 months.
It seemed
likely that the PRT would not exist in its current form once
British troop levels
reduced in
early or mid-2009, and that the US would take over the PRT at that
time.
992.
The
Stabilisation Unit review reported that while all PRTs in Iraq were
constrained
by
insecurity and a lack of Iraqi capacity, the Basra PRT faced a
number of additional
challenges:
“… a
part-time leader since January 2007, a dysfunctional structural
legacy, limited
resources,
and an absence of a long-term strategy due to uncertainty over its
future
ever since
its creation in April 2006.”
993.
Given those
constraints, the Basra PRT had performed well in some areas,
in
particular
in securing Provincial Council ownership of the Provincial
Development
Strategy
and building Iraqi capacity on budget planning and execution. The
PRT had
also
responded well to reconfigure itself to support Mr Brown’s
economic initiatives.
994.
It was,
however, clear that the PRT was not performing as well as it
could.
It also
needed to respond to the priorities set out in Mr Brown’s 22
July statement
to Parliament.
995.
The
Stabilisation Unit made 26 recommendations, of which one was
highlighted
in the
review’s Executive Summary: the appointment of a full-time Head for
the PRT.
The
Stabilisation Unit assessed that while the decision in 2007 to
double-hat the
Deputy
Consul General as the Head of the PRT had been reasonable, the
increased
expectations
on the PRT in the light of the improved security situation and from
the
US, and the
increased willingness of Iraqi citizens to meet members of the PRT
both
on and off
Basra Air Station, meant that “the PRT and PRT Head … could and
should
be busier”.
The double-hatting arrangement had led the US to express concern
that
the UK did
not attach sufficient importance to the Basra PRT, and that the PRT
was
too
concerned with delivering UK as opposed to coalition goals. The
Stabilisation Unit
concluded
that the arrangement was no longer credible.
996.
Maj Gen Salmon
reported on 7 September that, together with Mr Haywood
and
the Head of
the PRT, he had launched a re-orientated reconstruction programme
with
582
Report
Stabilisation Unit, 3 September 2008, ‘Review of the Basra
Provincial Reconstruction Team’.
357