Previous page | Contents | Next page
8  |  The invasion
548.  Lt Gen Pigott recommended preparing a strategic estimate for sustaining a
large-scale UK presence to March 2004.
549.  The second paper sent to the Chiefs of Staff on 25 March was Lt Gen Pigott’s draft
Phase IV military planning guidance.334
550.  Lt Gen Pigott stated that the MOD approach to Phase IV planning (“integration of
top down policy/strategic issues with bottom up operational/tactical realities”) “has kept
us reasonably balanced in a very uncertain environment”.335 With Phase IV “potentially
unfolding from now on”, it was time to take stock and update UK military commanders
and staff.
551.  The guidance outlined the wider strategic context for Phase IV, including the UK’s
post-conflict objectives and six “Strategic Lines of Operation”: disarmament, security,
humanitarian effort, political (initial governance and longer-term reconstruction of political
institutions), diplomatic and economic.
552.  Lt Gen Pigott summarised the US framework for Phase IV:
Phase IVa (stability), lasting 6, 12 or 18 months under best, moderate or worst
case scenarios;
Phase IVb (recovery), 18 to 24 months;
Phase IVc (transition), from 24 months.
553.  He explained that US command and control for Phase IV was “a very fluid area”,
had gone through a number of iterations and could be expected to change further.
554.  Lt Gen Pigott advised that the scale of the UK military effort in Phase IV would be:
“Informed by operational considerations in the JOA [Joint Operational Area], such as
levels of consent but also taking account of wider Commitments, we need to draw
down to nearer medium scale of effort by autumn 03.”
555.  Lt Gen Pigott explained that the UK distinguished between three levels of consent:
“High”, “Medium (Patchy)” and “Low”. These mirrored the US model of best, moderate
and worst case scenarios. Current UK thinking assumed “medium (patchy) consent
turning to high as the basis for Phase IV planning at this stage but recognises that there
will be areas where low consent is more likely, possibly for some time.”
334  Minute COSSEC to PSO/CDS, 25 March 2003, ‘OP COS Paper: Subject – Op TELIC – Phase IV
(Post Conflict): Military Planning Guidance’.
335  Minute DCDS(C) to COSSEC, 25 March 2003, ‘Op TELIC Phase IV (Post Conflict): Military Planning
Guidance’ attaching Paper [draft] DCDS(C), 25 March 2003, ‘Op TELIC Phase IV (Post Conflict): Military
Planning Guidance’.
99
Previous page | Contents | Next page