Previous page | Contents | Next page
7  |  Conclusions: Pre-conflict strategy and planning
437.  A military timetable should not be allowed to dictate a diplomatic timetable. If a
strategy of coercive diplomacy is being pursued, forces should be deployed in such a
way that the threat of action can be increased or decreased according to the diplomatic
situation and the policy can be sustained for as long as necessary.
438.  The issue of influencing the US, both at the strategic and at the operational level,
was a constant preoccupation at all levels of the UK Government.
439.  Prime Ministers will always wish to exercise their own political judgement on
how to handle the relationship with the US. It will depend on personal relationships as
well as on the nature of the issues being addressed. On all these matters of strategy
and diplomacy, the Inquiry recognises that there is no standard formula that will be
appropriate in all cases.
440.  Whether or not influence has been exercised can be difficult to ascertain, even
in retrospect. The views of allies are most likely to make a difference when they come
in one side of an internal debate, and there are a number of instances where the UK
arguments did make a difference to the formation and implementation of US policy.
The US and UK are close allies, but the relationship between the two is unequal.
441.  The exercise of influence will always involve a combination of identifying the
prerequisites for success in a shared endeavour, and a degree of bargaining to make
sure that the approach meets the national interest. In situations like the run-up to the
invasion of Iraq:
If certain measures are identified as prerequisite for success then their
importance should be underlined from the start. There are no prizes for sharing
a failure.
Those measures that are most important should be pursued persistently and
consistently.
If it is assumed that a consequence of making a contribution in one area is that
a further contribution would not be required in another, then that should be made
explicit.
Influence should not be set as an objective in itself. The exercise of influence
is a means to an end.
631
Previous page | Contents | Next page