Previous page | Contents | Next page
7  |  Conclusions: Pre-conflict strategy and planning
424.  There was no substantive discussion of the military options, despite promises
by Mr Blair, before the meeting on 17 March.
425.  In his statement for the Inquiry, Mr Hoon wrote that by the time he joined Cabinet,
in 1999:
“… the pattern of the organisation and format of Cabinet meetings was … well
established. Tony Blair was well known to be extremely concerned about leaks
from Cabinet discussions … It was my perception that, largely as a consequence
of this, he did not normally expect key decisions to be made in the course of Cabinet
meetings. Papers were submitted to the Cabinet Office, and in turn by the Cabinet
Office to appropriate Cabinet Committees for decisions.”195
426.  Mr Hoon wrote:
“At no time when I was serving in the Ministry of Defence were other Cabinet
Ministers involved in discussions about the deployment of specific forces and
the nature of their operations. Relevant details would have been circulated to
10 Downing Street or other Government departments as necessary … I do not
recall a single Cabinet level discussion of specific troop deployments and the nature
of their operations.”196
427.  The Inquiry recognises that there will be operational constraints on discussion
of the details of military deployments, but that would not preclude the discussion of
the principles and the implications of military options.
428.  In January 2006, the Cabinet discussed the proposal to deploy military forces
to Helmand later that year.
429.  The Inquiry also recognises that the nature of foreign policy, as the Report vividly
demonstrates, requires the Prime Minister of the UK, the Foreign Secretary and their
most senior officials to be involved in negotiating and agreeing policy on a day-by-day,
and sometimes hour-by-hour basis.
430.  It would neither be necessary nor feasible to seek a mandate from Cabinet at
each stage of a discussion. That reinforces the importance of ensuring Cabinet is kept
informed as strategy evolves, is given the opportunity to raise questions and is asked to
endorse key decisions. Cabinet Ministers need more information than will be available
from the media, especially on sensitive issues of foreign and security policy.
431.  In 2009, three former Cabinet Secretaries197 told the House of Lords Select
Committee on the Constitution:
195 Statement, 2 April 2015, page 1.
196 Statement, 2 April 2015, page 2.
197 Lord Armstrong of Ilminster, Lord Butler of Brockwell and Lord Wilson of Dinton.
629
Previous page | Contents | Next page