Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
The role of the IIA. An early statement of intent to hand over power to an IIA
while helping the Iraqi people to build a democratic future “should go down well”.
The UN Special Co-ordinator should have veto power over the IIA’s decisions.
Humanitarian issues. UK and US efforts were substantial: “we should play them
up in the media”.
Economic issues. After several wars and 12 years of sanctions, Iraq’s oil
revenues alone would not meet the “very heavy” cost of reconstruction,
particularly in the short term. “We need to share the burden with other developed
countries … But contacts with them tell us they will make their contribution
conditional on there being an authorising UNSC resolution for Phase IV.”
The World Bank would need to prepare a rigorous needs assessment, but that
too would probably need UN cover.533
1271.  On the UK’s bilateral effort, the paper stated that Ms Short was considering where
the UK might help with the longer-term contribution to “reform and reconstruction”. SSR
and reform of the public administration were two areas where the UK had a comparative
advantage. UK public finances were “tight”. If the UK was to keep armed forces in Iraq,
“the scope for a major effort on reform and reconstruction will be limited”.
1272.  The paper stated that the UK’s Armed Forces were fully stretched and would
need to scale down to about a third of current levels by the autumn. President Bush
would have similar concerns:
“So we both need an exit strategy. The key to that will be to get new Coalition
partners, which needs an authorising UNSCR. US/UK officials are working up a
lobbying strategy. But we must be realistic. The number of countries who have real
capability to offer is small.”
1273.  Efforts to secure additional Coalition partners are addressed in Sections 8
and 10.1.
1274.  Mr Blair discussed post-conflict issues with President Bush at Camp David
on 26 and 27 March.
1275.  Mr Blair recommended postponing the debate about what sort of
post‑conflict resolution was required until victory was secured and the UK
and US were in a position of strength.
1276.  Mr Blair and President Bush met at Camp David on 26 and 27 March.
The meeting is addressed in more detail in Section 9.1.
1277.  At dinner on the first evening, Mr Blair told President Bush that he did not want
his visit to Camp David to focus primarily on a UN resolution to deal with post-conflict
533 Paper FCO, 25 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Phase IV Issues’.
536
Previous page | Contents | Next page