Previous page | Contents | Next page
6.5  |  Planning and preparation for a post-Saddam Hussein Iraq, January to March 2003
“Construction of entirely new roads and buildings may in some circumstances
be permissible – where this is necessary for the relief effort or, for example for
maintaining security or public order. As you know, the scope for action on the other
issues … is limited. Any action going beyond these limits would require Security
Council authorisation.”
1043.  Mr Llewellyn offered further observations on 18 March, in which he emphasised
that “sweeping” institutional and personnel changes would not be permitted.444
1044.  The FCO informed No.10 that the UK continued to make progress
reconciling UK and US positions on the post-conflict role of the UN, but
significant differences remained.
1045.  The US accepted the need to internationalise Phase IV activity but wanted
to keep the “whip hand”, an approach that was “almost certainly not negotiable in
the UN Security Council”.
1046.  The FCO advised that the US must be held to the commitments made
at the Azores Summit. No Security Council authorisation would mean no wide
international effort and the likelihood of a much less consensual environment in
which to operate.
1047.  As “best friends” of the US, the UK should continue to offer advice on what
would and would not work.
1048.  On 17 March, the FCO informed Sir David Manning that the UK continued “to
make some good progress” in bringing together UK and US positions on the UN.445
The US now accepted that:
“The Phase IV reform and reconstruction task is much too big for the US/UK
to go it alone. All the traditional nation-builders will be required – the IFIs, the
UN, NGOs, and the big bilateral donors (eg the EU and Japan). We need wide
international support to allow us an exit strategy.”
Security Council authorisation would make it easier to secure international
support.
The international community would need a new Security Council mandate to
have a legal basis for a reform programme which would go beyond what was
allowed by the laws of armed conflict.
444 Minute Llewellyn to IPU [junior official], 18 March 2003, ‘Potential Humanitarian and Reconstruction
Activities in Iraq’.
445 Letter Owen to Manning, 17 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Phase IV (Day-After): US/UK Discussions on an
Authorising UNSCR’.
499
Previous page | Contents | Next page