Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
920.  DFID did not produce any proposals for longer-term reconstruction until
27 March.
Extending the Oil-for-Food programme
921.  Dr Rice gave Sir David Manning an account of White House thinking on the
handling of Iraqi oil on 13 March. The OFF programme should be left in place, but
sanctions lifted to allow Iraq to use the proceeds as it chose. OFF should be phased
out when there was an Iraqi entity ready to take over revenues. The US also wanted
to make clear that military operations would not be paid for out of Iraqi oil money. In
response, No.10 asked the FCO to prepare a note on UK plans for Iraqi oil revenues
for Mr Blair to use in public.383
922.  On 14 March, the FCO instructed the UK Mission to the UN in New York to
start discussions with the US delegation on a possible resolution to modify the OFF
programme and sanctions regime should military action lead to the absence of an
effective Iraqi government.384
923.  The UK position was summarised in the FCO background papers for the Azores
Summit, sent to No.10 on 15 March:
“If the Iraqi regime falls, new arrangements will need to be put in place to enable the
OFF to keep functioning. Our current plan is to table a resolution soon after conflict
starts … We are seeking to amend some of the procedures to speed up the process
for humanitarian goods …
“We would hope that the Secretary-General would be able to transfer full control
over oil revenues to a properly representative Iraqi Government as soon as possible
(not as the US have suggested, an Iraqi ‘entity’, which could, particularly if US
appointed, fuel suggestions that the Coalition was seeking to control Iraqi oil).”385
924.  Resolution 1472, adopted unanimously on 28 March, transferred authority for
administering the OFF programme to the UN Secretary-General for a period of 45 days,
with the possibility of further renewal by the Security Council.
Plans and preparations on the eve of the invasion
925.  In early March, the structure of ORHA and of the post-conflict Iraqi Interim
Authority (IIA) remained uncertain.
926.  On 6 March, a UK official working for ORHA in Washington reported to Mr Chilcott
that ORHA would welcome “UK ideas on how to handle [the] Iraqi Foreign Ministry” and
383 Minute Cannon to Owen, 14 March 2003, ‘Iraq: Iraqi Oil Post-Conflict’.
384 Telegram 149 FCO London to UKMIS New York, 14 March 2003, ‘Iraq – Military Action – Sanctions and
Oil for Food – Strategy Paper’.
385 Letter Owen to Rycroft, 15 March 2003, ‘Azores Summit’ attaching Paper FCO, ‘Iraq – Oil for Food
Programme (OFF) and Sanctions’.
478
Previous page | Contents | Next page