Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
“Agreement with US on Phase IV assumptions (IPU in hand)”; and
“Finalisation of military campaign objectives (Cabinet Office, in hand)”.
871.  Separate MOD advice to Mr Hoon stated that DFID expected to distribute
humanitarian relief through IOs and NGOs that would not be present until the
environment was benign.364 UK forces could find themselves in control of part of Iraq,
including Basra, before IOs and NGOs were willing to enter the country. Ms Short’s
agreement that DFID should take part in planning to manage the consequences of war
was welcome, but DFID’s likely plan was to distribute relief wherever there was a need,
not just in the UK AO. There was a danger that, even with DFID engagement, UK troops
would lack the resources to deal with the humanitarian difficulties they faced. Officials
recommended that the only way to be sure UK forces had access to the humanitarian
supplies they might need was for DFID to channel its funding directly through the
military.
872.  Section 13.1 describes the subsequent exchange between the MOD, DFID and
the Treasury on how to fund delivery of humanitarian assistance in the UK’s AO.
873.  On 9 March, Ms Short threatened to resign from the Government if the UK
took military action against Iraq without UN authorisation.
874.  In an interview for BBC Radio 4 on 9 March, Ms Short said she would resign from
the Government if the UK took military action against Iraq without UN authority.365 Asked
whether she thought Mr Blair had acted “recklessly”, Ms Short described the situation as
“extraordinarily reckless”. She continued:
“… what worries me is that we’ve got the old spin back and we have detailed
discussions either personally or in the Cabinet and then the spin the next day
is: ‘we’re ready for war’ …
“If it takes another month or so, that is fine … And I think you could get a world
where we see the UN in authority … proper care for the people of Iraq, because at
the moment the preparations to care for the humanitarian aftermath of any military
conflict are not properly in place.
“And there’s another major legal point – if there isn’t a UN mandate for the
reconstruction of Iraq … [i]t will in international law be an occupying army and won’t
have the authority to make changes in the administrative arrangements in Iraq.”
875.  In her memoir, Ms Short wrote that when she arrived in DFID on 11 March,
Mr Chakrabarti and senior officials had obviously been asked by No.10 to find out what
364 Minute MOD D/Sec to PS/Secretary of State [MOD], 7 March 2003, ‘OP Telic: DFID involvement and
the funding of immediate humanitarian assistance’.
365 BBC News, 10 March 2003, Clare Short Interview.
470
Previous page | Contents | Next page