Previous page | Contents | Next page
The Report of the Iraq Inquiry
748.  Lt Gen Reith presented two papers to the Chiefs of Staff on 4 March
advocating an expanded combat role for UK forces. He advised that the
implications for Phase IV should be a consideration.
749.  Mr Hoon and the Chiefs of Staff agreed that the UK should not actively seek
a wider role, but should be ready to consider any unsolicited US requests on
their merits. Implications for Phase IV operations would be one of a number of
considerations.
750.  On 4 March, Lt Gen Reith sent the Chiefs of Staff two papers setting out proposals
for employing UK land forces on combat missions with or without “a dedicated ‘UK
box’” based on “the agreed 1 (UK) Div AO”. The papers are described in more detail
in Section 6.2.328
751.  Lt Gen Reith explained that a UK box would “allow UK forces to move first in
a ground offensive and thereby set the conditions for the ‘exemplary performance’
in Phase IV”, but US resistance to the creation of a UK box would “probably only
be overcome by high level intervention”.
752.  In the first of the two papers, Lt Gen Reith addressed the advantages and
disadvantages of “UK ownership of its full AO from the start”. Under the existing Base
Plan, the UK AO would expand into space vacated by US forces as they moved north
and UK forces would not be able to shape their own Phase IV AOR. Lt Gen Reith
explained that one of the contingency plans already worked up by the Land Component
Command (LCC) assumed full UK ownership of its AO from the start. There could be
“no doubt at all that this represents a far better option for UK forces than the Base Plan”.
753.  In the second paper, Lt Gen Reith explained that his forthcoming meetings
with Lt Gen McKiernan and others would “almost certainly be the last chance that
the operational commanders will have to discuss the plan face to face before ground
operations commence”. US commanders were likely to press him on UK land
contributions beyond the provisions in the Base Plan.
754.  Lt Gen Reith put forward two options:
“National focus with limited operational exposure.” The Base Plan, involving
“operations within the AO as presently defined, concentrating on making
the early transition from Phase III to Phase IV, with an end state defined as
‘exemplary performance’ in Phase IV within Basra region”.
“Coalition focus with unconstrained operational exposure.” Among the
disadvantages of this approach was a reduction in the number of troops
328 Minute Reith to COSSEC, 4 March 2003, ‘Op Telic employment of UK forces’ attaching Paper
CJO, 3 March 2003, ‘Op TELIC Land Options for 1(UK) Armoured Division – update’ and Paper CJO,
4 March 2003, ‘Op TELIC Land Options for 1(UK) Armoured Divisions – Alternative Options’.
446
Previous page | Contents | Next page